25 April 2003
Powell Discusses Asian Support for U.S. Foreign Policy
(Speech to U.S. Asia Pacific Council Symposium April 24) (6860)
Following is a transcript of Secretary of State Colin Powell's April
24 remarks to the United States Asia Pacific Council Symposium on the
support Asian countries have provided with regard to Operation Iraqi
Freedom, anti-terrorism efforts, the North Korean situation, and other
foreign policy issues:
(begin transcript)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Office of the Spokesman
April 24, 2003
As Delivered
REMARKS
Secretary of State Colin L. Powell
At The United States Asia Pacific Council Symposium on
Changing Dynamics in the Asia-Pacific Region: Implications for U.S.
Business and Policy
April 24, 2003
Capital Hilton
Washington, D.C.
(10:15 a.m. EDT)
SECRETARY POWELL: Well, thank you very much, ladies and gentlemen, and
thank you, Stape, for that very, very kind and generous introduction.
It's a great pleasure to be with you here and especially to be
introduced by you, my friend, and it gives me the opportunity to thank
you once again for your contributions to American foreign policy and
to the values of the American people over a most distinguished career
of four decades, where you have focused on East Asia, the Pacific and
other parts of the Asian landmass.
And Stape, your career is well known to all of your colleagues here in
the room, as well as throughout the Department. You were a central
player in establishing a new U.S.-China relationship in the late '70s.
You served as our envoy to China, Indonesia and Singapore, and you did
it with unmatched insight and creativity and effectiveness. I know
that your leadership of this new Council will be equally distinguished
and equally valuable to our Asia Pacific community. So I congratulate
you for that and I am so pleased to be able to be here during this
first convocation of the Council.
And I really do appreciate your words about what things are like in
the business of diplomacy. And it's not a matter of prevailing. It's a
matter of serving the American people. It's a matter of serving the
President. We have a President who has a vision, a vision of a world
at peace, a vision where we work with friends and allies around the
world to pursue that desired goal of a world a peace. A world that
increasingly is worried and focused on the spread of democracy. A
world that comes together to deal with tyrants. A world that works on
free trade agreements of the kind that Bob Zoellick just described.
Free trade agreements not just for their own purpose or to serve the
business community, but as a way of generating wealth in countries
that desperately need wealth to bring people out of poverty and out of
despair.
The President has a vision of going after some of the great problems
that the international community faces, that the world faces --
famine, and perhaps one of the greatest threats to the world now, and
that's HIV/AIDS. And as the President goes forward in the execution of
his policies in the name of the American people, he will use all the
tools at his disposal -- diplomatic tools, political tools, economic
tools, the brilliant United States military that we have seen at work
in Iraq liberating the people.
All of these elements of national power come together in the White
House for the use of the President, and all of the members of the
President's national security team work hard every day to make sure
that we give him the very best advice, the very best counsel that we
can, so that he can make the decisions that he has been elected to
make for the American people.
And he does make those decisions and he does it in a bold way and he
does it in a principled way. And the world has seen George Bush act in
a dedicated and principled world and in a dedicated and principled way
in recent months, and that's the way he will continue to work during
the course of his administration and as he holds the reins of
leadership in the United States and for the international community.
And that is especially the case with respect to the way in which we
will approach Asia, with a vision, with a desire to cement our
friendships in Asia, with a desire to help those nations in Asia who
are still trying to find their way forward find that way forward. And
that's why this organization is important.
So many longtime friends of Asia and friends from Asia are here today
to welcome the inauguration of the United States Asia-Pacific Council.
The Board of Governors of the East-West Center deserves our
appreciation for hosting the new Council and it is a testament,
indeed, to the importance of the Council's mission that it has been
able to assemble such a stellar group of leaders, from industry,
academia, the media and government. The enthusiastic support of your
Honorary Chairman, George Shultz, who greeted you by video last night,
I think is further evidence of the importance to which we all attach
to the work of this Council.
Of course, we're all sorry that George could not be here in person,
but we all recognize what a role model he has been to all of us. The
importance that George attaches to building strong partnerships
between the United States and the nations of the Asia Pacific region
are well known, and only one of the many things that has been
far-sighted about George over the years.
I was National Security Advisor for the last two years of the Reagan
Administration serving alongside George, and there's one expression he
used to use all the time, which I have never forgotten, that diplomats
and all of us in the national security world have to tend the garden.
Colin, never forget to tend the garden. Deal with your friends, talk
to people, engage, listen to others, have proper respect for the views
of others. Try to develop a consensus so that you can move forward.
It's an essential ingredient of any good partnership. And this Council
will help us as we tend the garden in Asia. A council that is full of
Johnny Appleseeds and green thumbs.
When I travel to Asia, journalists traveling with me will often say,
"In this new century, does the United States believe that Asia is more
important than Europe, or is Europe more important than Asia, or how
has the balance shifted?" And, of course, my very diplomatic answer is
that both sets of relationships have been and will remain essential.
It's a diplomatic answer, but it also happens to be absolutely true.
It is in Europe and Asia where the United States finds a great
concentration of capable, likeminded partners, countries able and
willing to work with us to address common concerns. And certainly
Asia's weight in the world will only continue to grow.
But I would also say that a question like that is really a question of
the 20th century, not of the 21st century, not of the mindset that we
have to have for this century. Because so many of the opportunities
and challenges in the world today are not just transnational, not just
transregional, but they are global. Whether it's terrorism or the
spread of weapons of mass destruction, creating conditions for
sustainable development, going after infectious diseases, or promoting
democratic and accountable government, you can no longer just say it's
a European problem or an Asian problem or an American problem or an
African problem.
And it is no wonder that Asian countries have engaged so actively with
us and others in the world community to confront these global
challenges. Strong partnerships between the United States and our
allies and friends in the Asia Pacific region have been and remain the
pillars of security and prosperity in the region. And in this global
age, they are also becoming critically important for the world beyond
the Asia Pacific community, a world which depends upon the stability
and growth that together we can generate.
You hear so much, for example, about NATO going out of area. And,
indeed, in August, NATO will take over the direction of the
International Security Assistance Force in Kabul, in Afghanistan. Now,
ten years ago when we were wondering about "whither NATO" and we were
having these fascinating intellectual debates about whether there
would be a role for NATO, and could NATO think about going out of
area, we were thinking about just out of the immediate NATO area.
Nobody could have anticipated then that NATO would go half way across
the world to Asia and perform peacekeeping missions in a place like
Afghanistan.
And even more significant, members of the alliance are now talking
about how they can play a role in Iraq. And for its part, the European
Union is playing a welcome role in helping the Israelis and
Palestinians back onto the road to a lasting Middle East peace.
I would argue, in reverse, that the nations of the Asia Pacific region
are also going out of area. Already, Asian countries have made crucial
contributions to combating international terrorism. Asian nations are
extensively engaged in helping to rebuild Afghanistan. Japan
co-chaired the Steering Group of Afghan Reconstruction Countries that
came together, and Japan hosted our first highly successful
international donors meeting. And it's no coincidence that our allies
in East Asia have been key partners in Operation Iraqi Freedom.
They stood by us when the going got tough. In the days during and
after our intensive efforts to encourage the United Nations to enforce
its own resolutions, they were there and they stood by us. They did
not waver. A transpacific partnership so vital for so long to keeping
the peace of Asia now contribute in crucial ways to peace worldwide.
As it was for Afghanistan, Australia, for example, was one of our very
first coalition partners in Iraq, sending troops to fight on the
ground and aircrews to fight from the sky.
Korea is sending an engineering brigade and a medical battalion to
Iraq, as well as also providing $10 million for reconstruction and
humanitarian assistance, in addition to what they have done in
Afghanistan.
Japan has given strong support to Operation Iraqi Freedom, as well as,
at the same time, making a substantial commitment to Afghan
reconstruction. Prime Minister Koizumi has shown the way in Asia with
his personal leadership to deal with both of these challenges far away
from the islands of Japan. Japan has pledged over $200 million to
post-war humanitarian assistance in Iraq, including assistance to
Iraq's neighbors. So Japan clearly understands the role that it must
play on the world stage, not just as part of the Asia Pacific part of
the world, but as a part of the world community.
The Philippines announced its full support for Operation Iraqi
Freedom. Immediately, at the first opportunity they had to do so, they
did it, and they have stood alongside of us.
Many others around the region, such as our good friend, Singapore,
contributed to the coalition effort.
What has already been achieved in Afghanistan and Iraq is remarkable,
and enormous opportunities have been opened in those two countries.
U.S.-led coalition forces destroyed -- destroyed in Afghanistan -- a
major terrorist training ground, and now is in the process of
liberating the long-suffering people of Afghanistan from the dual
tyranny of the Taliban and al-Qaida, freeing a Muslim people and
putting in place a Muslim government to lead those people.
Afghanistan will not become an American colony or a 51st state; quite
the contrary, we were willing to invest our time and our treasure and
the lives of our young men and women, along with the lives of other
coalition soldiers and sailors and airmen and marines, to bring
freedom to the people of Afghanistan.
Now, Afghanistan is governed by the most representative leadership in
its history and on its way to full constitutional government. For the
first time in over two decades, the men and women of Afghanistan can
look to the future with hope.
So too, liberation in Iraq is a great victory for freedom. It has
freed the region and it has freed the world from the threat posed by
the potentially catastrophic combination of a rogue regime with
weapons of mass destruction and terrorism. But above all, it has freed
the Iraqi people from a vicious oppressor.
Now, we and our coalition partners, and many others who are now
becoming a part of the coalition effort, are committed to helping the
liberated Iraqi people, help them achieve a stable and united country
under a representative government that will use Iraq's great natural
human talent and its wealth, its oil wealth, to benefit all of its
citizens. Iraqi oil will be used by the Iraqi people for the Iraqi
people. The future of Iraq, finally, will be in the hands of its own
people.
To the region and to the world, Iraq can become an example of a state
transformed from a threat to a contributor, a contributor to
international peace and security. How wonderful it was over the last
several days to watch millions of pilgrims, for the first time in
almost 25 years, practice their faith, marching to Karbala.
It was our coalition, this great coalition that came together, that
liberated them from a Muslim dictator and once again gave them the
ability to practice their faith. It was a wonderful day. And to see
General Jay Garner, United States Army, Retired, up in the northern
part of the country being greeted by the people with such affection
and with thanks for what we have been able to achieve. A new day. A
new day has begun in Iraq.
The international community, the United Nations, the EU, so many other
organizations throughout the world, will all be playing vital roles in
the relief, recovery and reconstruction effort in Iraq. And I have no
doubt that many Asian nations, in addition to our coalition partners
that I have mentioned already, will have the opportunity to take part
in these noble efforts.
Meanwhile, the larger international campaign against terrorism
continues and must continue. And Asia Pacific countries have worked
hard in this campaign. They have tightened their financial control
system. They have worked to improve law enforcement. They have
improved border controls and they're working on document security so
we know who is traveling throughout the region, and whether they are
traveling for peaceful purposes or for evil purposes.
And the Asian nations have dramatically increased intelligence
cooperation, not just bilaterally with the United States, but with
each other as well, as we make it clear that terrorism has to be dealt
in a comprehensive way. Countries that once had reservations about
intelligence sharing, are now among the strongest advocates of such
sharing, realizing how much it is in their interest to do so.
The Philippines, for example, has worked closely with our forces to
not only share intelligence, but to work with our military and other
forces to stop terrorist groups operating within its own borders.
Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia have cracked terrorist cells. China
has cooperated with us bilaterally and as a permanent member of the
United Nations Security Council to pass those necessary resolutions
that will implement the international will with respect to terrorism,
including that historic resolution that is the foundation for all that
we do, Resolution 1373.
In Indonesia, to take yet another example, it finally awakened to the
threat of terrorism within its own borders, and has worked hard and
has arrested many of the perpetrators of the terrible Bali bombing and
brought to justice the leader of one of the terrorist organizations
that claimed responsibility. All of the ASEAN and others joined us in
asking the United Nations to designate that group, Jemaah Islamiyah,
as a terrorist organization. Even as we cooperate bilaterally with the
countries of the region, we are working hard to bolster regional
forums and help focus the efforts of these forums on terrorism and
other transnational challenges.
At the APEC meeting last year, President Bush and the other leaders of
APEC issued a counterterrorism declaration, a powerful declaration
that will strengthen cooperation within APEC dealing with the security
of trade, knowing what's transiting through our ports; deal with cyber
infrastructure protection to make sure that the powerful tool that we
now have available to us, the Internet, is not used for evil purposes,
and making sure that we have protected the global financial system so
that we know when dirty money is passing through that system and
heading to terrorist organizations.
And just a few months before that, my Southeast Asian counterparts and
I signed the Joint ASEAN-U.S. Terrorism Declaration, and we and our
ASEAN regional partners agreed on ground rules for combating terrorist
financing. Last month in Malaysia, we co-hosted another ASEAN regional
forum workshop on ways to improve border security while facilitating
the flow of people and goods.
So in this new century, with all of its perils, America's commitment
to Asia's security and stability endures. For Asia's sake, for our
sake, and for the sake of the international community, we are all in
it together, and we will work with our partners to adapt our alliances
and other relationships to meet these new 21st century needs.
With South Korea, for example, we are engaged in a Future of the
Alliance Initiative. President Roh has welcomed these discussions
aimed at modernizing the alliance and adapting it to the changing
regional and global security dynamics. This process, this open
transparent process between two allies, will result in strength and
deterrence, including an expanded role for the Republic of Korea and
its forces in the defense of the peninsula, and an enhanced
contribution of U.S. forces to regional security and stability.
There has been a lot of media attention on these discussions, and a
lot of media attention especially within South Korea. And sometimes
media is focused on what they believe is some effort on the part of
the United States to get to a reduced commitment to South Korea's
defense. Nothing, nothing could be further from the truth.
Our goal, in fact, is to reinforce our deterrence and reshape our
force structure so that our alliance is positioned to serve for the
long term. The size and shape of the U.S. footprint in any number of
places may change, but we will remain steadfast in meeting the
security obligations that geography, history and destiny have placed
upon us.
As President Bush has made clear repeatedly with respect to the Korean
Peninsula, we do not want to see nuclear weapons on the peninsula. We
seek a peaceful solution to the international community's serious
concerns about North Korea's nuclear weapons program. As the President
has said repeatedly since the beginning of this situation -- I like to
call it last fall -- we will pursue every diplomatic channel.
And that's why, for the past two days, we have been participating in
meetings in Beijing with the Chinese and with the North Koreans. This
is an early meeting, no intention of resolving any issues at this
meeting. It was a way of bringing three countries in a multilateral
setting who had a great interest in this problem together to exchange
views to hear one another. Strong views were presented. The North
Koreans presented their point of view strongly; the Chinese did, as
well, as did the United States.
The meetings are coming to a close now. The sides will return to their
capitals and assess what they heard, analyze proposals that were put
down by the parties, and determine where we will go next. The one
thing that is absolutely clear as a result of this meeting, once
again, is that there is unity within the community that we must not
allow the peninsula to become nuclear.
It's the strong views of the Chinese Government, of course, of the
United States, of Japan, of South Korea, and of Russia, Australia, and
other neighbors in the region. North Korea must come to understand
this. North Korea must also come to understand that we will not be
threatened. We will not respond to threats. We look for a way forward
that will eliminate this threat and put North Korea on a path to a
better future, a better future that will provide a better life for its
people.
So we will analyze the results of this first set of discussions and
see where we are going to go. The one thing we are also absolutely
committed to is that there must be a multilateral approach and a
multilateral solution to this problem. Nuclear weapons on the Korean
Peninsula are a threat to every neighbor in the region, and a threat
to the region, and we believe a threat to us as well. And it is for
that reason we have insisted that all of the nations in the region
play a role.
China has stepped up; South Korea and Japan are ready to participate
in future conversations, when and if those conversations are held. And
I hope the North Korean delegation will return to Pyongyang with a
clear understanding of our point of view, as we have listened
carefully to their point of view. I am particularly impressed at
China's willingness to play an active role in these discussions, and I
congratulate China for playing such an active role.
Our relationship with China has come a long way since the beginning of
this administration. It was just about two years ago when we were in
the midst of the EP-3 crisis. You'll recall when our reconnaissance
plane collided with a Japanese (1) fighter. We went into the ditch at
that point, and people wondered if whether or not we were in for a
long period of hostility and frozen dialogue.
Quite the contrary. We dealt with that problem, came out of it, and
today we are pursuing so many promising new areas of cooperation with
China, from counterterrorism to nonproliferation and stability in
North and South Asia.
This should surprise no one. As China's role in the world has grown,
so too has its responsibilities and our expectations. There should be
no doubt that despite our cooperation we still have serious
differences with China. We haven't stepped back from our principles or
our commitments. But our cooperative agenda with China is better and
richer and deeper than ever because we find that China and the United
States have a mutual interest in addressing a wide range of global
concerns. Thirty years ago, China had a little foreign trade. Today,
it is a global manufacturing powerhouse to whom we look as a partner
in fostering and sustaining global growth. We are working closely with
China to ensure it fulfills all of its World Trade Organization
commitments and to advance the WTO's Doha agenda trade negotiations.
Of course, creating conditions for an expanding global economy entails
more than maintaining a fair and open international trading system. It
also means cooperating with other nations to address the full range of
global challenges that touch each member of the world community, not
least of all China and the United States.
And so we are seeking to bring China into the group of nations working
to fight the global scourge of HIV/AIDS. We have also developed
important bilateral dialogues on international crime and law
enforcement and on climate change. And we seek to bring China into a
more global conversation about how to tackle these issues, as well,
because they are global in nature.
In the key area of human rights and religious freedoms, there still is
much work to be done. China's citizens must have freedom to express
their views peacefully and the protections of a fair and transparent
legal system. After a year, 2002, after a year of promising steps
culminating in a productive U.S.-China human rights dialogue last
December, we have seen some disturbing setbacks. We have talked to the
Chinese candidly and directly about these setbacks and we have seen
some improvement.
Our goal is to turn human rights into a positive element or our
relationship, and so we are watching China's behavior and its
decisions very closely and remain in very close dialogue with them.
Inevitably, China's actions in the human rights area will continue to
affect our overall bilateral relationship. As we look ahead, however,
we will not allow areas of difference to preclude cooperation in areas
where we share interests. The United States will continue to work
creatively with China, as well as with all of our longtime allies and
friends in Asia, to foster stability in the region and in the world.
We will also continue to provide the security in that part of that
world through our military presence that underpins growth not only in
Asia, but the kind of growth we need throughout the world. Because
it's the kind of growth upon which America's own prosperity depends.
U.S. trade with East Asia now exceeds that with Western Europe, and it
includes some of the largest and fastest growing economies in the
world. Open economies support American jobs and income and broaden the
foundations upon which democratic institutions can be constructed and
create incentives to settle problems peacefully. When problems can be
settled peacefully, you encourage more investment. Investment does not
go to troubled parts of the world where that investment might not be
safe.
And you can see in the last decade alone, U.S. exports to Asia grew by
more than 80 percent and U.S. imports from Asia grew by more than 150
percent. U.S. investments in Asia nearly tripled during the same
period to over $200 billion, about equal to the amount that Asians
have invested in the United States. This two-way trade and investment
pattern must continue and must be expanded.
As is the case elsewhere, political stability in Asia is inextricably
linked to economic prosperity. When an economy founders, there are
political consequences. Likewise, when political systems are askew,
there is economic fallout. It makes good sense, therefore, that we are
actively promoting open markets, economic reform and pro-growth
policies in all of our key bilateral relations in the region and
especially using institutions such as APEC and ASEAN.
And now a new threat to the region's economies has arisen. The
outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome reminds us that
infectious disease knows no borders and requires an effective and
coordinated response at local, national and international levels.
Experts from our Centers for Disease Control are working around the
clock in coordination with their counterparts in the region to prevent
its spread and to find effective treatments. Already SARS is having a
serious economic impact on tourism, commercial air travel, and other
sectors touched deeply by the globalization of trade, manufacturing,
and finance.
It is in all of our interests that Asian countries meet the challenges
of this kind of threat, SARS, but also the challenges of political and
economic reform, and also that the region continues to be the economic
dynamo that it has been in past decades. We especially support Prime
Minister Koizumi's economic reform agenda to return Japan to a strong
and sustainable growth path. An economically robust Japan is of great
importance to regional and global economic growth.
As I mentioned, we are closely monitoring China's implementation of
its World Trading Organization commitments. And with its full
compliance, we believe that will help spur further economic
development, economic reform, help promote the rule of law, and
increase the flow of ideas and information to the Chinese people, and
from the Chinese people. As you have heard Bob Zoellick say earlier,
we have concluded a free trade agreement with Singapore and are
pursuing another one with Australia.
Last year, President Bush unveiled the Enterprise for ASEAN
Initiative, which offers Southeast Asian nations a roadmap to free
trade, so they can increase their competitiveness and growth
prospects. And we are working within APEC to promote open trade and
investment and structural reform throughout the region. We are
strengthening our ties in ASEAN through the ASEAN cooperation plan
that I announced last year in Brunei. This plan focuses not just in
institution-building within ASEAN, but also on narrowing the
development gap among Southeast Asian countries.
In all of these initiatives, it is not just what the government does;
the private sector -- the private sector is the key to the success of
each of these efforts. And so the Bush administration, and President
Bush himself, personally committed to building and strengthening
partnerships throughout our Asia Pacific community. And we applaud the
United States Asia Pacific Council's efforts to heighten U.S.
engagement in the region.
The enterprising nations of the Asia Pacific are at the forefront of a
worldwide phenomenon, an increasing awareness that the 21st century
holds extraordinary opportunities, as well as some threats and
challenges; opportunities to work with allies, friends, and even
former adversaries to resolve longstanding conflicts; opportunities to
form coalitions against global challenges such as terrorism and
weapons of mass destruction; and above all, opportunities to advance
worldwide well-being on an unprecedented scale by freeing ordinary
people to pursue their dreams.
In the new century, I am absolutely confident that Asia will be a
growing force for global peace and prosperity. This is the future of
Asia. This is the future of Asia the Bush Administration and President
Bush personally envisions. And it is the Asia we will work with to
make sure that this is not a dream deferred, but a dream that we can
reach and capture for the benefit of the peoples of Asia and the
peoples of the world.
It is Asia's tomorrow that is taking shape today, and you are playing
a vital role in making sure that we achieve our goals and that we
achieve that dream. It's an exciting time to be in the foreign policy
community. It's an exciting time to see world regimes start to move to
the side and disappear. It's an exciting time to see the international
community come together with all the fractious behavior that sometimes
occurs within the international community, even with some of the
heated debates that you see and the disagreements that go on, whether
it's within NATO or within the United Nations.
What comes through all of this noise, however, is the reason for the
noise. It has a simple one-word descriptor. The reason for so much of
this noise is democracy. Free people, free sovereign nations,
debating, arguing, fighting, trying to achieve compromise, achieving
consensus, all for a common purpose, to spread the values that we all
believe in, the values of democracy, the value of individual human
rights, the value of an open trading system, a system of values that
come together for the purpose of freeing mankind from poverty and
disease and want and fear. That's what we are all joined together to
do, and I congratulate you for this step that you have taken to form
this council, to be a part of this great crusade.
Thank you very much.
(Applause)
MODERATOR: The Secretary has agreed to take a few questions so --
Yes, sir.
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, thank you very much for your very inspiring
speech, as always.
I have two questions: one on Korea and the other one on the Middle
East. First, Korea, as we face the nuclear issue, too many people have
been emphasizing peaceful solutions. Now, obviously, there is no
question that everybody prefers peaceful solution. But I think it's
most important that we have a solution. Are we making it absolutely
clear to North Korea that the solution has to be found, peaceful or
otherwise? Because, otherwise, it tantamounts to license for him to
operate any way he wants. So that's the first question.
Second question is the Middle East. As you know, we faced large
problem with Middle East because Arabs, as a whole, are very skeptical
about the United States positions. They fear that the United States
has been favoring Israel at the detriment of their interests. Correct
or incorrect, irrationalization or otherwise, that is the prevailing
perception. Now I think it is high time that United States have to
solve this problem.
What would you do, in terms of leaning on Israel to do their part to
promote peace this time? Thank you.
SECRETARY POWELL: On the first question, we have made it absolutely
clear to the North Koreans, and, working with North Korea's neighbors,
I think all of them with us have made it absolutely clear to North
Korea that a nuclearized peninsula is unacceptable. The Chinese have
said it rather clearly. They said it most clearly and most powerfully
last fall when President Jiang Zemin was at Crawford visiting
President Bush at his ranch, and the Chinese have been acting on that
policy of theirs. And that's why they were one of the participants in
the discussions of this week. So we have made it absolutely clear.
As you know, we have not taken any options off the table, but the
President remains convinced that a peaceful solution can be found
through diplomacy and through political action. But it's going to take
efforts on the part of all of North Korea's neighbors. North Korea
would like to make it a U.S.-North Korean problem; it is not a
U.S.-North Korean problem. That's how they tried to solve it last time
and it didn't work.
The Agreed Framework kept some weapons from being built for some
period of time. But, at the same time, we thought we had the genie
captured in one bottle, the North Koreans were building another bottle
and had a genie in it dealing with enriched uranium. The solution has
to be denuclearization of the peninsula.
We have also made it clear to North Korea that they have nothing to
fear from denuclearization. The nations in the region stand willing to
help. The South Koreans have made it clear that they want to have a
better relationship with North Korea, that they want people to go back
and forth, they want families to be unified; they are one people.
The Japanese Government, in the presence of Mr. Koizumi, Prime
Minister Koizumi, when he visited last year, made it clear that Japan
would like to move forward and help North Korea with development. And
so there are nations in the region that want to help North Korea out
of its isolation and out of the destitute circumstances in which its
people live.
And North Korea has to come to the understanding that all of that is
there available if they behave in a more responsible way, with respect
to nuclear weapons programs and with respect to other actions that
they take, whether it be developing and selling missiles, or testing
long-range missiles that threaten the region. We will be firm. We will
continue to press for a diplomatic solution. We will remove no options
from the table. And the North Koreans should not leave the meetings in
Beijing, now that they have come to a conclusion, there may be some
more bilateral meetings between the United States and China, and
between China and North Korea. But our meetings with North Korea are
in the trilateral or multilateral setting.
But they should not leave this series of discussions that have been
held in Beijing with the slightest impression that the United States
and its partners, and the nations in the region will be intimidated by
bellicose statements, or by threats or actions they think might get
them more attention, or might force us to make a concession that we
would not otherwise make. They would be very ill-advised to move in
that direction.
With respect to the Middle East, we have been pressing for a long
period of time for a new, transformed leadership to emerge in the
Palestinian Authority. We had a breakthrough yesterday, and Mr. Abu
Mazen was able to form a cabinet, which he will now present to the
Palestinian Leadership Council. When the Council accepts that cabinet
and gives Mr. Abu Mazen a vote of confidence, he will become the Prime
Minister of the Palestinian Authority, with authority to act. That
gives the Israelis, and it gives us, and it gives members of the
Quartet and other members of the international community somebody that
we can work with, who is, I believe, committed to moving forward to a
settlement.
As the President has said, when he has been confirmed by the PLC and
assumes the office, we will release the roadmap that we have been
working on, and the international community is ready to help both
parties move forward on that roadmap. Both parties have obligations
and responsibilities, and we have been in touch with both parties
about their obligations and responsibilities.
It will be a difficult task to move forward, but the President is
committed. He is committed to the vision he laid out last June 24th in
his well-known speech, a vision that also embraced by the Arab
nations, the Arab League, and that is to bring into being a
Palestinian state that will live side by side in peace and in security
with the state of Israel. And that remains our goal.
And the President, with this new development, and with the
presentation of the roadmap, the President has instructed me to be
prepared to engage much more fully and much more directly and much
more aggressively in the process of moving forward along the roadmap.
MODERATOR: We have time for one more short question.
Yes.
QUESTION: How would you compare the way that the United States
defeated Japan in World War II and dealt with the Emperor and the
Shinto religion, with the way that the United States has defeated Iraq
and is planning to deal, or has dealt, with Saddam Hussein and with
the Islamic religion?
SECRETARY POWELL: The United States removed a regime that was led by a
dictator who was terrorizing his people, had developed weapons of mass
destruction, was in clear violation of UN resolutions for a long
period of time. It was a war against that regime, done under the
authority of appropriate UN resolutions. That regime is gone.
Our commitment right now is to allow the people of Iraq to decide how
they will be governed, to decide who will represent them, to make all
of the decisions with respect to the use of the resources of the land
to benefit the people. It is a Muslim country and we are quite
confident, and by what you have seen in television, you can be quite
confident, that they are free to practice their religion in ways that
they could not for decades.
And so it is not a matter of us dealing with their religion. We
understand their faith. We respect the faith of Islam. And we will try
to show them and help them create a democratic system of government
that is in no way contrary to their beliefs or to their faith. There
should be no suggestion that people who practice a particular faith
are somehow kept from also having a representative form of government.
And, hopefully, this will be achieved in a relatively short of period
of time. Leaders are emerging. We are sending over Special Envoy
Khalilzad, the President's Envoy, and Ambassador Ryan Crocker back to
the region to have regional meetings where people can assemble and
decide who will represent them in larger meetings; put in place an
Iraqi interim authority, develop a constitution, develop a judicial
system, and make sure we have gotten rid of the weapons of mass
destruction.
So we will deal with the religion of the country just by dealing with
it. It is there. And it is the faith of the people, and we will
respect that faith and give them political institutions that will
accommodate their beliefs and give them the opportunity to live in
peace among themselves, and especially with their neighbors.
Thank you very much.
(Applause.)
MODERATOR: Mr. Secretary, as a new organization, we have not yet been
able to develop the full range of paperweights and plaques with which
to show true appreciation. (Laughter.) But let me, on behalf of this
organization and everyone here, express our deep thanks to you, both
for the time you have taken and for the substantive richness of your
presentation.
I think, like the North Koreans, we are all going to have to go home
and pour over your words in order to appreciate it. But your support
is important for the success of this organization, and for the success
of our engagement with the Asia Pacific region. Thank you very much.
(Applause.)
(1) The U.S. reconnaissance plane collided with a Chinese fighter
(end transcript)
(Distributed by the Office of International Information Programs, U.S.
Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)
|
NEWSLETTER
|
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list
|
|
|
