|
SHAPE
News Summary & Analysis
15
April 2003
TRANSATLANTIC
RELATIONS
- Expert
suggests NATO role in Iraq “would heal many hurts”
- Task
force named to heal U.S. ties with Europe
|
OPERATION
CONCORDIA-ESDP
- Operation
Concordia seen uniting “transatlantic rivals”
- EU
nations propose increase in defense budgets
|
BALKANS
- NATO-led
troops formally advised of Russian withdrawal from Balkans
|
TRANSATLANTIC RELATIONS
- Looking
at the status of transatlantic relations, Philip Gordon, a
senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, writes in the
International Herald Tribune that a NATO role in post-war
Iraq would “heal many hurts.” Noting
that NATO has experience with peacekeeping and disarmament,
an available pool of troops, existing command arrangements
and a proven track record of promoting defense reform and
civil-military relations in former authoritarian states, Gordon
lists what he sees as the many advantages of giving NATO a
key role in post-war Iraq. He says: Nowhere else is there
a pool of available and experienced peacekeepers who could
gradually replace U.S. and British soldiers currently deployed
in Iraq. Involving NATO in post-war Iraq would also help to
legitimize the reconstruction process in the eyes of many
around the world—making a UN mandate more likely and
facilitating the provision of EU reconstruction funds. Giving
a role to NATO would prove that Iraq was not a mere American
protectorate, while still giving America confidence that security
would be ensured. Involving NATO in Iraq’s security
arrangements would also be a vital step toward giving America’s
European allies—including Russia—a stake in the
reconstruction of Iraq. “Getting NATO involved
in Iraq would not only help share the burden of what could
be a difficult and costly occupation, but it could be a first
step toward repairing the vital trans-Atlantic relationship,”
Gordon insists.
- According
to the Financial Times, former Secretary of State
Kissinger and Larry Summers, a former treasury secretary,
were named Monday to head a task force to find ways to repair
the fractured relationship between the United States and Europe.
The Council on Foreign Relations (CPR) group will examine
the state of U.S. policy toward Europe at a time when the
transatlantic alliance has been shaken by disagreements over
the war in Iraq, the article says. It adds that the CPR task
force will assess the seriousness of the rift and consider
whether the United States needs to reorient its relationship
to Europe. It will also consider whether a close working relationship
with Europe remains important to U.S. interests.
OPERATION CONCORDIA-ESDP
- Referring
to Operation Concordia, the Wall Street Journal observes that
“little noticed amid the trans-Atlantic feuding
over Iraq, something remarkable is happening in the Former
Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: (Gen. Maral), a French general
is leading an EU peacekeeping mission, thanks to support from
the United States.” The story of the mission
suggests that hard facts and common interests can force disaffected
allies to cooperate, even when their leaders are not talking
to each other. It also shows how essential international unity
is to the success of such missions, stresses the newspaper,
adding: NATO is cooperating closely with the EU’s maiden
peacekeeping mission. Gen. Maral’s boss is a German
NATO deputy commander. The mission itself was designed by
NATO planners. If the 350 lightly armed troops get in trouble,
NATO forces from neighboring Kosovo will bail them out.
- Germany,
France, Belgium and Luxembourg are discussing substantial
increases in defense spending ahead of a meeting of the four
countries’ defense ministers later this month, according
to a draft document spelling out ambitious plans for ESDP,
reports the Wall Street Journal. According to the article,
the document, drafted by Belgium, is intended as a statement
of intent of the four nations to boost defense spending, pool
military procurement and planning, and merge various other
defense initiatives among EU members. Under the plan,
each of the participating nations would reportedly commit
to spending at least 0.25 percent of its GDP on military investment
and equipment to modernize its defense forces starting next
year, and at least 0.45 percent of GDP by 2012 at the latest.
Noting that for some countries, that would mark a
substantial increase, the newspaper stresses: According to
the U.S. Defense Department’s latest annual Report on
Allied Contributions to the Common Defense, dated June 2002,
Germany spent just 0.2 percent of its GDP on defense modernization
in 2001, France 0.52 percent, Belgium 0.07 percent and Luxembourg
0.13 percent. The U.S., by comparison, spent 0.75 percent
of its GDP on defense modernization in 2001 and Britain 0.7
percent. The article adds that although the four countries
would initially represent a minority of the EU’s soon-to-be
25 members, the plan foresees the eventual inclusion of other
nations “that share the same desire to launch concrete
initiatives” toward the formation of a proper European
defense union.
BALKANS
- AP quotes
an SFOR spokesman saying Tuesday that NATO-led troops
in the Balkans have been formally advised that Russia will
pull its peacekeepers out of the region. “The withdrawal
process will occur with close coordination between Russian
military authorities and NATO,” an SFOR spokesman
is quoted saying and adding that it will not affect the peacekeepers’
ability to carry out their mandate. He reportedly noted, however,
that “Russian soldiers and officers have been
highly professional and committed to the joint goals of bringing
stability to the region, and for these reasons their contribution
will be missed.” The dispatch recalls that
last week Russian authorities announced the decision,
citing financial concerns and a lack of a war threat in the
Balkans as the reason for their withdrawal.
|