|
SHAPE
News Summary & Analysis
8
April 2003
IRAQ
- Blair,
Bush: UN to have “vital role” in post-war
Iraq
- Foreign
Secretary Straw to discuss post-war Iraq with French,
Spanish counterparts
|
BALKANS
- Norwegian
government to reduce size of KFOR contingent
|
ESDP
- Chief
of Polish General Staff commits 1,200 personnel to EU
military force
|
IRAQ
- At
a joint news conference in Northern Ireland Tuesday, carried
live by CNN, Prime Minister Blair and President Bush said
the UN would have a “vital role” in all aspects
of post-war Iraq, from humanitarian aid to a future interim
authority. Blair said it was a “false choice”
to debate whether Iraq should be run by coalition forces or
the UN, adding: “The key is that Iraq in the end should
be governed by the Iraqi people.” He reiterated his
pledge that British and U.S. forces would not stay in the
country “a day longer than necessary.” Bush told
the news conference Iraq would “move as quickly as possible”
to an interim authority made up of Iraqis from inside and
outside the country. He added that the interim authority would
rule until a new government could be elected by the Iraqi
people.
- Reuters
quotes a Foreign Office spokesman saying Foreign Secretary
Straw will meet his Spanish and French counterparts Wednesday
for talks on post-war Iraq with a view to finding common ground
that could lead to a UN resolution. The spokesman
reportedly said the talks would cover the broad principles
of post-war Iraq but that ministers would not discuss the
specific wording of any draft resolution. The talks could,
however, lay the groundwork for a future UN mandate. The spokesman
added that Straw had similar talks on Iraq with Foreign Minister
Fischer last week.
The
question of whether Saddam Hussein was alive or dead after a
U.S. warplane bombed a building where he was believed to be
meeting with his sons, coupled with the advance of coalition
troops in Baghdad, are contributing to keeping the media focus
on post-war Iraq.
A commentary in Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, April 7, suggested
that the post-war era offers an opportunity for a new beginning
in relations between Germany and the United States. The newspaper
advocated a return of relations between the German government
and the U.S. administration at least to a sensible business-as-usual
level. “We must make sure that this relationship is more
than a mere relic of the past that is vanishing behind jabbering
of multipolarity and the feeling of having all-pervading powers,”
stressed the daily.
In a contribution to Le Figaro, a group of French Conservative
parliamentarians, who opposed the French government’s
stance on Iraq, advocate the need to “rebuild alliances”
once the war is over. Arguing that France, the EU, NATO and
the UN must be fully associated to the reconstruction of a democratic
Iraq and a post-war Middle East, the parliamentarians suggest
that the best way for France to promote this is to quickly take
up with the “fundamental alliance which links us with
those whose moral and human values are the closest to ours,
i.e., the countries taking part in the coalition (against Saddam
Hussein).” While acknowledging that “we must not
follow the United States or others blindly,” the parliamentarians
stress that in future, “we must offer a common front in
resisting fundamentalism, terrorism and proliferation of all
kinds.” Together, they continue, “we must install
peace in the Middle East and the world, in a multipolar world
in which the influence of the United States and the EU is balanced
and prominent.” They insist, however, that this requires,
among other things, a foreign and defense policy, proportional
to Europe’s importance as a continent with 450 million
citizens. Calling for France’s reconciliation with Britain,
Spain, Italy, Portugal, as well as former East European nations,
the parliamentarians conclude: “Friendships can evolve,
but we must retain the core which linked us for two centuries
and which enabled us to defeat Nazism and Communism….
We will need this western alliance in the future in a world
more chaotic and dangerous than what we had been used to during
half a century of Cold War.”
BALKANS
- Oslo’s Aftenposten,
April 7, quoted a Defense Ministry press release saying the
government is to reduce the number of Norwegian soldiers in
KFOR as a result of a need to balance Norway’s military
contribution in the Balkans with involvements in other international
operations, mainly in Afghanistan and the Mediterranean.
The adjustment means that Norway will reduce its contribution
to the force from 760 to 500 soldiers, said the article, adding
that the Defense Ministry believes that the danger of war
in the Balkans is past and that today KFOR is larger than
necessary. The newspaper noted that NATO is planning to considerably
reduce the size of the operation in Kosovo.
ESDP
- According to Warsaw’s
Trybuna, April 5, Gen. Piatas, Chief of the General
Staff of the Polish Armed Forces, has announced that Poland
will commit 1,200 service personnel from various types of
units to EU forces. The article added that the head
of the EU Military Committee, Gen. Haegglund, visited the
Polish General Staff Friday and said that once Poland signs
the accession treaty in Athens on April 16, it will gain the
status of active observer within the EU military forces. Gen.
Haegglund stressed that the EU has no intention of establishing
forces that would rival those of NATO, said the article, continuing:
The EU will use the Alliance’s command and communication
structures in the same way that it is currently doing in the
Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. In Gen. Haegglund’s
opinion, NATO is far better prepared to carry out offensive
operations as it can draw on the military potential of the
United States.
|