The Largest Security-Cleared Career Network for Defense and Intelligence Jobs - JOIN NOW

Military

22 September 2002

Transcript: Rumsfeld Plans to Propose NATO Rapid Reaction Force

(Interview with CNN September 21) (3070)
Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld says he plans to discuss a
proposal for a rapid reaction force when he meets with NATO defense
ministers in Warsaw, Poland next week.
"NATO is an important institution, it's a military alliance. We're a
significant member of it," Rumsfeld said in an interview with CNN
September 21. "And my proposal is really no different than the kind of
thing we've been doing here in the United States, suggesting that one
of the transformational things NATO could do would be to develop a
quick reaction force that would be able to respond to a problem in a
matter of days rather than weeks or months, and to have the kind of
agility to deal with the types of problem that exist today."
Rumsfeld said he also plans to discuss the situation in Iraq with his
NATO counterparts and noted that Great Britain and other countries
"have indicated either publicly or privately that they're in a
position to be quite cooperative with respect to what the United
States might or might not do with respect to Iraq."
The Defense Secretary said that "inspections do have a place in the
world if the country is cooperative," but stressed that the goal in
Iraq is disarmament.
"To favor inspections, one would have to make a conscious judgment
that Iraq was cooperative, and that means they'd have to review the
past decade and come to that conclusion. And that's a difficult thing
for a reasonable person to do it seems to me," he said.
When asked whether or not having Saddam Hussein leave Iraq voluntarily
would be an acceptable option, Rumsfeld said that "the goal in my view
is that Saddam Hussein not be a threat, and not have the relationships
they do with terrorist states, and not threaten their neighbors, and
not have weapons of mass destruction programs."
"If Saddam Hussein decided to take a handful of his family and senior
leaders and go away and no longer would Iraq have those weapons, and
no longer would they threaten their neighbor, I think that would be --
I personally think that would be a good thing for the world. Whether
it's reasonable or not, I have no idea," he said.
Following is a transcript of the event, as released by the Department
of Defense:
(begin transcript)
Secretary Rumsfeld's CNN Television Interview
(Television interview with Jamie McIntyre, CNN)
McIntyre: Well, Renay, why I'm here in the Pentagon Briefing Room with
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who has been at work this morning.
But he has taken some time out to come down and talk to us.
Normally this is the scene of the confrontations between you and the
Pentagon Press Corps. Today, we have the briefing room to ourselves.
Welcome.
Rumsfeld: Thank you very much.
McIntyre: Let me start off with the news from Baghdad today. Iraq said
today that it will not cooperate with any new U.N. Security Council
resolutions that run contrary to an agreement that it believes it
reached with the U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan. Your reaction to
that?
Rumsfeld: Well, I don't know that I have a reaction. Certainly, one
can't be surprised. Anyone that has watched the past decade has seen
the Iraqi government defy some 16 U.N. resolutions and change their
position depending on what they thought was tactically advantageous to
them, and have jerked the United Nations around. So, it is no surprise
at all.
McIntyre: By taking that tact, does Iraq effectively play into your
hands, into the United States' hands by giving you justification for
moving ahead with possible military action?
Rumsfeld: Well, of course, those are judgments that the president will
make after talking to Colin Powell and others who are working the U.N.
piece of the puzzle. But, it is not the UN and Iraq, I mean the United
States and Iraq, it's Iraq and the United Nations. So, they couldn't
be playing into our hands in any sense. They are doing what they have
done to the United Nations over a period of many, many years, and
that's to defy them.
McIntyre: Let me ask you about inspections, because I listened very
carefully to what you said this week as you were testifying before the
House and the Senate about inspections. And you seemed to very clearly
say that you didn't think inspections could work. You said that they
tend not to be effective when the target is determined not to be
disarmed. But at the same time, the U.S. seems to be pressing for this
resolution for inspections. How do you square that?
Rumsfeld: I wasn't aware that the United States was pressing for a
resolution for inspections. And, I don't believe it's correct. I think
the president's speech is the United States Government's position.
There are various other countries that are floating resolutions of
various types, including a number that involve inspections, there's no
question about that. And certainly they're being discussed with a
United States representative. But to my knowledge, the United States
has not proposed any resolution that suggests inspections. What I
would like to clarify, or at least amplify on what I said, or what you
read that I said. I said a good deal about it, but I said that
inspections do have a place in the world if the country is
cooperative. And, the goal is disarmament. The goal is not
inspections. And inspections can work if a country is cooperative, and
they want to prove to the world that they have, in fact, disarmed.
That is when inspections work, because you can go in and inspect and
then validate what that country has done by way of disarming. In this
instance, one would have -- to favor inspections, one would have to
make a conscious judgment that Iraq was cooperative, and that means
they'd have to review the past decade and come to that conclusion. And
that's a difficult thing for a reasonable person to do it seems to me.
McIntyre: You were also pressed this week about whether was anything
short of war that Saddam Hussein could do. And you seemed to indicate,
or one thing you suggested is, he could leave, perhaps seek asylum
somewhere. Is that a practical possibility?
Rumsfeld: Only he would know.
McIntyre: Where could he go?
Rumsfeld: Oh, my goodness, I'm sure there are countries that would be
delighted to have him. There are countries that have taken Baby Doc
Duvalier, and Idi Amin Dada, and the Ethiopian dictator.
McIntyre: Would that be acceptable to the United States, if Saddam
Hussein was able to leave with perhaps a large sum of money, and live
comfortably in some other country?
Rumsfeld: The goal of -- that is a question for the president and not
for me. The goal in my view is that Saddam Hussein not be a threat,
and not have the relationships they do with terrorist states, and not
threaten their neighbors, and not have weapons of mass destruction
programs. If Saddam Hussein decided to take a handful of his family
and senior leaders and go away and no longer would Iraq have those
weapons, and no longer would they threaten their neighbor, I think
that would be -- I personally think that would be a good thing for the
world. Whether it's reasonable or not, I have no idea.
McIntyre: Let me take you back -- 
Rumsfeld: I was being pressed by Senators asking me if there's any way
that it could happen, and certainly that's one way.
McIntyre: Well, let me take you back to about 20 years ago. The date,
I believe, was December 20, 1983. You were meeting with Saddam
Hussein, I think we have some video of that meeting. Tell me what was
going on during this meeting?
Rumsfeld: Where did you get this video, from the Iraqi television?
McIntyre: This is from the Iraqi television.
Rumsfeld: When did they give it to you, recently or back then?
McIntyre: We dug this out of the CNN library.
Rumsfeld: I see. Isn't that interesting. There I am.
McIntyre: So what was going on here, what were you thinking at the
time?
Rumsfeld: Well, Iraq was in a battle, a war, with Iran. And, the
United States had just had 241 Marines killed, and President Reagan
asked me to take a leave of absence from my company and serve as a
temporary special envoy. And among -- I traveled throughout the Middle
East for a period of months, and we were trying to get the Syrians to
get out of Lebanon, and stop killing Americans at the Marine barracks.
And among other things, we believed it would be helpful if Saddam
Hussein's Iraq would behave in a way in that region that would be
helpful to our goals with respect to Syria and the terrorist threat
that existed. And we decided it was worth having me go in and meet
with him. In that visit, I cautioned him about the use of chemical
weapons, as a matter of fact, and discussed a host of other things.
McIntyre: You were pressed during the briefings -- during the hearings
this week by Senator Byrd on the question of whether the U.S. in any
way aided Saddam Hussein in his chemical weapons program. At the time
during the hearings, you said you had no knowledge of it. Have you
looked into it since then?
Rumsfeld: I had no knowledge. I have no knowledge today. I also, I
think advised him, I thought it was most unfortunate that even the
implication of that would be raised simply because of some article
that somebody wrote. I cannot believe that that would be true. And
certainly, I would have had absolutely nothing to do with it. The
cables from the visit I had with Saddam Hussein and Tariq Aziz
indicate that I cautioned them about their own chemical program, let
alone what was suggested by the Senate hearing.
McIntyre: Again, listening very carefully to the words that you said
this week, I got the distinct impression that there's nothing Saddam
Hussein could do that would result in him remaining in power. There's
no way that he could comply with what you expect of him. Is that true?
Is there any way that Saddam Hussein could do something and remain in
power?
Rumsfeld: Well, the president set forth the problems to the U.N. The
U.N. over a period of 11 years has set forth the problems to Iraq.
Clearly a regime, a government in Iraq that ended and disarmed weapons
of mass destruction programs, stopped threatening their neighbors,
stopped repressing their people, and where the people would be freed
of the terribly vicious regime that's being imposed on them, would
solve the problem. Now, is he capable of behaving in that manner?
You're as good a judge as I.
McIntyre: All right. We'll continue our conversation with Defense
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. When we come back, we'll ask him about the
proposal he's taking to NATO next week, and essentially a message for
NATO to get its assets in gear. We'll be back with that in just a
moment.
(Commercial break.)
McIntyre: I'm Jamie MacIntyre live at the Pentagon Briefing Room with
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. Secretary Rumsfeld, you're going to
an informal meeting of NATO defense ministers next week in Poland, and
I understand you're carrying a U.S. proposal for a rapid reaction
force. Tell me about that?
Rumsfeld: Well, if you think what we've been trying to do in
transforming our military it is to enable our forces to respond more
quickly, to do it with a smaller number of -- a smaller footprint, as
we say here at the Pentagon, and to be capable of dealing with a
problem, a variety or range of problems, very quickly. NATO is an
important institution, it's a military alliance. We're a significant
member of it. And my proposal is really no different than the kind of
thing we've been doing here in the United States, suggesting that one
of the transformational things NATO could do would be to develop a
quick reaction force that would be able to respond to a problem in a
matter of days rather than weeks or months, and to have the kind of
agility to deal with the types of problem that exist today.
McIntyre: Is this a move on the U.S. part to push NATO more into what
they call out of area operations? For instance, will you be pressing
NATO allies to take a bigger role in Afghanistan, perhaps in the
International Security Assistance Force?
Rumsfeld: Well that's two questions. In answer to the first question,
no, it's not a matter of pushing NATO into doing more things out of
the area, they have to decide that in each case, as they have in the
past. And they have a variety of ways of doing it, they can do it as
NATO, or they can do it with a NATO command structure that then brings
in other countries besides NATO countries, as we have, for example, in
Bosnia or Kosovo. But, with respect to what NATO might or might not do
in Afghanistan, that would be totally disconnected from the proposal
that the United States will be making in Warsaw later this week.
McIntyre: What kind of a pitch will you be making to the NATO allies,
many of whom are still reluctant about supporting the United States
for possible military action in Iraq. I think really only Great
Britain has said it would support unilateral action by the United
States. Everybody else seems to be waiting for some sort of U.N.
imprimatur to be put on the action. What kind of a case will you be
making to those allies?
Rumsfeld: We'll certainly be discussing the situation as it's
evolving. I think you're technically incorrect, and there are other
countries that have indicated either publicly or privately that
they're in a position to be quite cooperative with respect to what the
United States might or might not do with respect to Iraq.
McIntyre: One of the NATO allies, Germany, is in the middle of an
election campaign, there will be elections there tomorrow, and there's
been a thread of anti-American sentiment in some of those election
statements. Will you be meeting with your German counterpart. Do you
think that will come up at all, do you find that helpful or unhelpful?
Rumsfeld: The German government recently released its defense
minister. Whether or not the replacement for that person will be in
Warsaw I have no idea. I certainly have no plans to meet with that
person when I'm there.
McIntyre: What about Russia? You met with the Russian defense minister
here. Russia is a key to what happens in the United Nations Security
Council. Russians seem to -- Russian officials who were here in
Washington this week seemed to indicate that they thought Iraq might
be fairly close to complying with disarmament. How far apart is the
United States and Russia, and what needs to be done there?
Rumsfeld: I think it would not be correct to suggest that either one
of the ministers suggested that Iraq was close to disarmament. I think
you might go away from some of the comments they made saying that they
favor inspections, and that Iraq might be close to agreeing to some
sort of inspections. I didn't hear everything they said here, but at
least in the meetings with me I would characterize it that way. I
think that Minister of Defense Sergei Ivanov will be in Warsaw. We did
talk about Iraq while he was here. He and his foreign minister had a
meeting with President Bush that was -- where the president spoke very
forcefully about his views on Iraq, and indicated that he had only
hours before had a discussion on the phone with President Putin of
Russia. So certainly President Bush and Colin Powell are working with
the Russians on this matter.
McIntyre: The U.S., we're told, has some 800 troops in the East
African nation of Djibouti, including some Special Forces. What are
they doing there?
Rumsfeld: We have troops in a number of locations around the world,
and the horn of Africa has been an area that is of interest from the
standpoint of the global war on terrorism, and we've gotten some very
good cooperation from some countries in that part of the world, on the
Horn. And they have a variety of purposes, and I just don't really get
into the details of what they're doing in different places.
McIntyre: In fact, Yemen just recently rounded up a couple more al
Qaeda suspects. Was there any U.S. involvement in that?
Rumsfeld: That particular action was done totally by the Yemeni
forces. You're right, we do have forces in Yemen, and we have been
assisting them with some training, and they have been cooperating with
the global war on terrorism. And we've been pleased with the actions
that they've taken recently to try to round up Al-Qaeda terrorists.
McIntyre: No interview would be complete if we didn't at least touch
on the subject of Osama bin Laden. Has his trail gone cold? Is there
any more evidence about his fate?
Rumsfeld: Except in the media, I've not heard much about him. Indeed,
I don't believe I've seen a hard piece of information that would
persuade me that he was alive since last December, and it's now
September. He may be alive, he may be dead, he may be injured, but
I've not seen anything that persuades me that I could have high
confidence with respect to any one of those three answers.
McIntyre: You're not of the growing opinion he might be dead?
Rumsfeld: Well, back in February and March I indicated he might be
dead.
McIntyre: Well, we'll leave it there.
Rumsfeld: But, I just don't know. And I don't believe other people who
speculate know.
McIntyre: Thank you very much Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. I'm
Jamie MacIntyre live at the Pentagon.
Rumsfeld: Thank you.
(End of segment.)
(end transcript)
(Distributed by the Office of International Information Programs, U.S.
Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list