Three Tracks of Mideast Strategy Must Proceed Concurrently
(Boucher says political, security, economic issues "go hand in hand") (1380) State Department Spokesman Richard Boucher said the three tracks of the U.S. Middle East peace strategy, comprising political negotiations, security cooperation, and Palestinian institution building, must proceed together because they are "mutually reinforcing." Speaking at the June 11 State Department press briefing in Washington, Boucher said the proposed Middle East ministerial meeting to be held in summer 2002 would be one of the elements moving all three tracks forward. "This is not necessarily some extended negotiating session that will produce the final results. Nor is it going to end up being merely a rubber stamp of something that's been agreed beforehand. At the same time, we do envisage going into the conference with some ideas," said Boucher. With regards to Palestinian political reform, Boucher emphasized that the goal of the United States "is not to choose the Palestinian leadership." "Our goal is to help the Palestinians build a responsible institution of government, the institutions of government that will be needed for a Palestinian state, which can be created through negotiation. Our goal is to work with Palestinians themselves, the voices in the Palestinian community, who want to see reform. Our goal is to see proper accounting for the funds that might be used to help rebuild the economy in the Palestinian Authority. Our goal is to see reform of the Palestinian security institutions, so that they can take responsibility for security and stay clean and not have ties to terrorists." "Those are our goals," said Boucher, "not to choose a particular leadership." Following are excerpts form the June 11 State Department briefing with Richard Boucher: (begin excerpt) QUESTION: I don't want to overdo what seems to be a misperception about planning for a conference, but is it a semantic problem? In other words, you have a foreign ministers meeting in mind, not a summit, and that seems to be the misunderstanding, that it's not a summit? MR. BOUCHER: Yes. The President keeps getting asked about summits, and it's not a summit. It's a ministerial meeting, to be chaired on our side by Secretary Powell. We think this is an important part of moving forward on peace in the Middle East. We need to move forward, as we say, on all three tracks of our strategy: the political, the security, and the economic and institution-building. And those things go hand in hand. We've talked before about how they're mutually reinforcing, and a ministerial meeting in the summer is one of the ways to move forward on those issues. That's what we're still thinking about; that's what we're planning; and that's what we're discussing in all these series of discussions that we've had with various leaders. QUESTION: Can I just follow that up quickly? The Egyptians -- not the President, but his advance man -- were speaking, as you've heard so many times before, about how it has to be well prepared, but it sounded like he wanted the outcome known in advance, so that it would succeed. Do you envision going into a conference with sort of ideas not fixed, and people just batting ideas back and forth? MR. BOUCHER: I think -- QUESTION: Remembering Madrid, for instance. MR. BOUCHER: Yes. First of all, you have to remember that this is one of the elements of moving forward on all three of these tracks. This is not necessarily some extended negotiating session that will produce the final results, nor is it going to end up being merely a rubber stamp of something that's been agreed beforehand. At the same time, we do envisage going into the conference with some ideas. The President now has had a chance to listen to any number of leaders from the region. The Secretary -- he sent the Secretary out to the region. He sent the Director of Central Intelligence out to the region; Ambassador Burns has been out there very recently. We have their debriefs. The Secretary mentioned to you the Foreign Minister of Saudi Arabia will be here later this week. So with all those views, with all this information, and granted sometimes contradictory views and contradictory pieces of information, we need to put together some of our ideas. And as the Secretary said, the President will lay it out when he is ready. QUESTION: Are you suggesting that perhaps in the future, to alleviate any confusion, that people asking the President or others at the White House should refrain from using the word "summit," as it seems to be confusing to them over there? MR. BOUCHER: Well -- QUESTION: Or are you suggesting that it's the reporters who are getting it wrong? MR. BOUCHER: The reporters always get it wrong, I'm sure. (Laughter.) QUESTION: Well, would that clear it up if people started talking about a ministerial conference when asking people at the White House about it? MR. BOUCHER: This is an idle debate, Matt. I'm not trying to blame it on the reporters or the use of one word. I'm trying to say that when -- QUESTION: That's exactly what you did. You said the President was asked about a "summit," not a ministerial conference. MR. BOUCHER: No, that's not exactly what I did, Matt, and I would invite you to read the transcript, first of all. And second of all, I'm not asserting that any lack of clarity in the news is because the reporter asked the wrong word in the question, but I do want to make clear that we have been consistent on this in talking about it as a ministerial meeting, and we'll continue to do that. QUESTION: Could you clarify perhaps on -- is the meeting going to be used to help put in place conditions in the Palestinian Authority to move forward, or do those conditions need to be in place before the meeting itself can move forward? Yesterday the President said the timing isn't right, the conditions aren't there yet, and no one has confidence in the emerging Palestinian government. MR. BOUCHER: All those things are true. As we go forward, as we look at all these views and hear back from others, we do think that reform needs to proceed; that reform is one of the tracks that we need to move forward on. As the White House Spokesman said yesterday, it goes hand in hand with the other things. We've talked here frequently about how a reform is part and parcel of all these different steps, of proceeding on the economic track, on the political track, on the security track. And there is in fact a strong movement within the Palestinian Authority to carry out reform. But all this proceeds we would say concurrently, hand in hand -- whatever -- but it needs to proceed together so that the steps that provide the political horizon can be reinforced by steps that provide real security for Israelis and Palestinians alike. QUESTION: Is the meeting one of those steps, or are the steps leading up to the meeting? I don't think that's clear. MR. BOUCHER: I think the meeting is one of those steps in terms of advancing this whole process, this whole three-part strategy. ----- QUESTION: Does the United States plan to use influence to change the Palestinian leadership? MR. BOUCHER: Our goal is not to choose the Palestinian leadership. Our goal is to help the Palestinians build a responsible institution of government, the institutions of government that will be needed for a Palestinian state which can be created through negotiations. Our goal is to work with Palestinians themselves, the voices in the Palestinian community, who want to see reform. Our goal is to see proper accounting for the funds that might be used to help rebuild the economy in the Palestinian Authority. Our goal is to see reform of the Palestinian security institutions so that they can take responsibility for security and stay clean and not have ties to terrorists. Those are our goals, not to choose a particular leadership. Chairman Arafat is the leader of the Palestinian Authority, and we'll work with him in that capacity. One of the things that he needs to lead on is to build the institutions that can be reliable and responsible support for a future Palestinian state. (end excerpts) (end excerpt) (Distributed by the Office of International Information Programs, U.S. Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)
|
NEWSLETTER
|
| Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|
|

