UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Military

SLUG: 2-284193 Pentagon Justice (L-O)
DATE:
NOTE NUMBER:

DATE=12/12/01

TYPE=CORRESPONDENT REPORT

TITLE=PENTAGON/JUSTICE (L-O)

NUMBER=2-284193

BYLINE=ALEX BELIDA

DATELINE=PENTAGON

CONTENT=

VOICED AT:

INTRO: A top Defense Department official appeared before the Senate Armed Services Committee to defend the Bush administration's controversial plans to set up military tribunals to try foreign terrorists. More from Pentagon Correspondent Alex Belida.

TEXT: Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz is quick to point out that military justice authorities are still working out details of the process that will be following by the tribunals.

Mr. Wolfowitz also stresses that President Bush has not yet designated any suspects to be tried by such special military panels.

But he tells the Senate committee there are historical precedents that, in the administration's view, are relevant.

/// WOLFOWITZ ACT ///

During and following World War Two, we did not bring German and Japanese war criminals to the United States for trial in civilian courts, we tried them by military commissions.

/// END ACT ///

Mr. Wolfowitz also argues there are special advantages to using military tribunals - including speedier trials, safeguards for sensitive evidence, and a more secure process than possible in civilian courts.

/// WOLFOWITZ ACT ///

By using military commissions, we can better protect civilian judges, jurors, and courts from terrorist threats and assure the security of the trial itself.

/// END ACT ///

The notion of military tribunals has drawn some criticism from civil-rights groups fearful that individual liberties may be jeopardized.

But while the ground-rules are not yet set, Mr. Wolfowitz suggests foreign terrorists do not deserve the same kinds of legal protections that would, for example, bar evidence deemed taken by police in an illegal search.

/// WOLFOWITZ ACT ///

Imagine if a foreign terrorist were sneaking into the United States with a trunkload of anthrax in the back of the car and a policeman unreasonably opened the trunk and found it. I do not think we would want that evidence excluded in a trial, and that might be a reason why you would consider a different criminal procedure.

/// END ACT ///

Members of the Senate Armed Services committee voiced few concerns about the administration's plans during the hearing. But during one exchange with Mr. Wolfowitz, Senator Edward Kennedy questioned whether some foreign governments might seize on the U-S military tribunal to justify their own secret military trials.

/// REST OPT ///

/// KENNEDY ACT ///

(KENNEDY): What is the administration doing to see that America's credibility in criticizing these secret military tribunals in other countries will not be undermined by the (President's) military order?

(WOLFOWITZ): Senator, I think that is one of the reasons why we want to work out very carefully the kinds of procedures that will make the judgments of any military commission that we establish meet a full standard of fairness.

/// END ACT ///

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has said the main suspects the United States hopes to capture and possibly bring before a military tribunal are senior leaders of the al-Qaida terrorist network.

But most have eluded capture in Afghanistan, though some have been killed in the fighting. (SIGNED)

NEB/BEL/RAE



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list