UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Military

19 November 2001

Transcript: Powell Welcomes Moves to Form Broad-Based Afghan Government

(He was interviewed November 18 on ABC's "This Week" talk show) (2330)
Secretary of State Colin Powell says he welcomes a Northern Alliance
agreement to participate in a meeting with other Afghan groups to
begin forming a broad-based post-Taliban government for Afghanistan.
"The purpose of that meeting is to bring together the factions as
quickly as possible, so that as quickly as possible we can create an
interim government that can go in and begin to take administrative
control in Kabul, and then over a longer period of time, you create a
more comprehensive, broad-based government," Powell said in an
interview November 18 on ABC's "This Week" Sunday talk show.
The agreement, Powell said, was announced by Northern Alliance Foreign
Minister Abdullah Abdullah and U.S. Envoy James Dobbins at a news
conference in Tashkent.
"We're not going to dictate what they do with their government," said
Powell. "We will say to the Afghan leaders that if you truly want a
representative government that will be respected in the eyes of the
world, and that reflects the aspirations of all the Afghan people, you
have to include women in this political structure."
Powell said that during this transition period there may be a
requirement for some military presence to bring in humanitarian
supplies or for the purpose of providing a level of stability in the
towns being liberated.
Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaida terrorist group are still in
Afghanistan, and the U.S.-led coalition is still actively pursuing
them, said the Secretary of State.
"We think he's still in Afghanistan," Powell said. "There aren't many
countries around Afghanistan which would welcome him at the moment, or
for that matter, any country in the world, with one or two exceptions,
that would welcome him.
"So I think, as the President has always said, the noose is getting
tighter. We're going to get him out of his hole sooner or later, but
we'll get him."
Powell said the campaign against terrorism in Afghanistan is "a very
successful beginning" of a much broader campaign.
"We want to go after al-Qaida wherever it exists in the world. And it
is in some 50 countries, and any one of those cells in those 50
countries could be planning a terrorist operation right now during
this Ramadan season.
"And so we're not going to lose sight of that objective, and we're not
going to lose sight of the broader objective that the President put
before the American people and put before the world that has brought
this coalition together, is that we're going after terrorism around
the world."
Following is the transcript of the interview:
(begin transcript)
U.S. Department of State
Secretary Colin L. Powell
Washington, DC
Interview On ABC's "This Week"
November 18, 2001
QUESTION: (In progress) happen next in Afghanistan. And what about
Usama bin Laden? A short time ago, Secretary of State Colin Powell
joined us to answer those questions and others.
Thanks so much for being here this morning, Mr. Secretary.
SECRETARY POWELL: Good morning, Cokie.
QUESTION: We've heard that the hunt for Usama is getting closer. Is
that the case? Are we about to get him?
SECRETARY POWELL: Well, I think his options are being narrowed. As
more and more of the country is released from Taliban domination, he
has fewer and fewer places in which to hide. We think he's still in
Afghanistan. There aren't many countries around Afghanistan which
would welcome him at the moment, or for that matter, any country in
the world, with one or two exceptions, that would welcome him.
So I think, as the President has always said, the noose is getting
tighter. We're going to get him out of his hole sooner or later, but
we'll get him.
QUESTION: We heard David Wright say that he has found evidence in
those safe houses of some link to September 11th. They have also seen
in those houses evidence of looking at bombs. Do you think Usama has a
bomb?
SECRETARY POWELL: I have no reason to believe that he has a nuclear
weapon. There's no doubt that he would like to have had one, and I'm
sure they were trying to see what they could do to bring the
components together to produce one. But based on what I've seen so
far, it's most unlikely that he had one or was anywhere near getting
one.
QUESTION: Now, Usama is -- the American people see very strongly as a
sign that we've won if we get Usama bin Laden. But the news of the
past week is sounding like the war is getting won. Is it effectively
won?
SECRETARY POWELL: One part of the conflict, I think, is moving along
rather well, and that is to get the Taliban regime out of power and to
make it much more difficult for the al-Qaida network to function in
Afghanistan. We're not going to lose sight of the objective of
destroying the al-Qaida organization in Afghanistan and getting Usama
bin Laden.
But as the President has said from the very beginning, our campaign is
much broader than that. We want to go after al-Qaida wherever it
exists in the world. And it is in some 50 countries, and any one of
those cells in those 50 countries could be planning a terrorist
operation right now during this Ramadan season.
And so we're not going to lose sight of that objective, and we're not
going to lose sight of the broader objective that the President put
before the American people and put before the world that has brought
this coalition together, is that we're going after terrorism around
the world.
And so this is the beginning -- a successful beginning, I believe --
of a very long campaign. And we have to be patient, we have to be
persistent, and at the end, I'm confident we will prevail under the
President's leadership.
QUESTION: I want to come back to that in a minute, but I want to stay
in Afghanistan for a couple more minutes.
In terms of what's happening there on the ground in the fighting,
there are reports today that there's a CIA paramilitary force in
there. Are they -- first of all, is that true? And secondly, what role
are they playing?
SECRETARY POWELL: Well, I don't want to confirm what the CIA does or
does not do. Let me just say that they have been doing some rather
splendid work with respect to our activities in Afghanistan, working
alongside our military forces that are inside in Afghanistan that
we've reported on rather extensively.
I think we've got a very fine linkup between our intelligence assets,
our military assets, all within the framework of a good
political-military strategy. And it's now starting to show rather
significant results.
QUESTION: Now, there are those who say that the diplomacy is behind
the military action. And you've had the return of a former Afghan
leader, Rabbani, coming in, talks about a meeting coming up this
coming week, maybe in Europe, of various Afghan factions. Is that
going to happen? And what is the significance?
SECRETARY POWELL: We think the diplomacy is catching up with the rapid
pace of military operations. United States Ambassador Jim Dobbins, who
is our Special Envoy to the region, and to work with the Northern
Alliance, had a meeting this morning in Tashkent with the Foreign
Minister of the Northern Alliance, Mr. Abdullah.
And Mr. Abdullah has agreed on behalf of the Northern Alliance to send
Northern Alliance representatives to a meeting that's being convened
by Mr. Brahimi, the Secretary General of the United Nations'
representative on these matters.
Now, where that meeting will be held is still being debated. And the
purpose of that meeting is to bring together the factions as quickly
as possible so that as quickly as possible we can create an interim
government that can go in and begin to take administrative control in
Kabul, and then over a longer period of time, you create a more
comprehensive, broad-based government.
QUESTION: And while that  -- 
SECRETARY POWELL: So things are now starting to move on the diplomatic
front rather well.
QUESTION: And while that interim government is in place, does that
require peacekeepers on the ground, including US peacekeepers?
SECRETARY POWELL: It may well require some military presence on the
ground, if that seems to be appropriate, both in order to bring in
humanitarian supplies, or for the purpose of just providing a level of
stability in the towns that are being liberated.
And I think we'll have to make a judgment on each of those places as
we go forward. In Mazar-e-Sharif, coalition forces are coming in.
That's the town in the north that was the first one that was
liberated. And they have come in, really, to help with the delivery of
humanitarian supplies and provide more security in that region so that
the nongovernmental workers and human rights workers and humanitarian
workers and UN workers can get in to deliver food.
QUESTION: One of the extraordinary things that happened over this
weekend was the First Lady giving the radio address and talking about
the women of Afghanistan. And you have issued a State Department white
paper on that subject which says -- and we're going to put it up here
-- "The Afghan people want, and the US Government supports, a
broad-based representative government which includes women in
post-Taliban Afghanistan."
Does that mean the United States says to Afghanistan, you must include
women in your government?
SECRETARY POWELL: We will say to the Afghan leaders that if you truly
want a representative government that will be respected in the eyes of
the world and that reflects the aspirations of all the Afghan people,
you have to include women in this political structure.
Now, this, I think, can be done. There are Afghan women who are more
than able to contribute to such a government. And we're not going to
dictate what they do with their government. It has to come out of the
Afghan people.
But we hope they will realize, having gotten rid of the Taliban,
having gotten rid of these deprivations and these degradations that
they were putting on women and against women, it is now time to allow
women to participate more fully in Afghan society, and that includes
the political structure of a future Afghan government.
QUESTION: Now, there are those who say this is all part of a
propaganda ploy -- and you do have a new office of public diplomacy --
but there are those who say no propaganda will work unless the Middle
East, Palestinian-Israeli situation is solved.
You're making a major speech tomorrow. You're expected to talk about
this issue. We hear that you're going to say that -- you're going to
waive the seven days of no violence before the Mitchell Plan goes into
effect. Is that the case?
SECRETARY POWELL: Well, the two are not that directly linked. Usama
bin Laden tried to steal the Palestinian issue, but he failed, and
Chairman Arafat said clearly he wants no part of bin Laden and
considers him an outcast.
QUESTION: What about the  -- 
SECRETARY POWELL: With respect to the Middle East, I will be making a
speech tomorrow. I will lay out a vision that the United States has,
and I believe the international community has, for settlement --
QUESTION: And will you waive the seven days?
SECRETARY POWELL: I'll get to that. I didn't impose the seven days, so
therefore I can't waive it. We'll have to see how Mr. Sharon reacts to
my speech and what other actions he might take.
What Mr. Sharon has said -- and he was the one who said he needed
seven days of quiet before he would be in a position to participate in
discussions with the Palestinian side -- Mr. Sharon is determined to
bring the violence down. He was brought into office on the basis of
security for the Israeli people.
And so we are in a delicate situation right now, and I hope that my
statement tomorrow will lay out what the United States believes, our
vision, a comprehensive statement of our vision. No new plans are
coming. We have a plan. It's a plan that works, the Mitchell Plan. And
what we have to do is to get the two sides talking to each other,
security officials to security officials, in order to get a cease-fire
in place.
With that cease-fire in place, lots of things happen quickly, leading
to negotiations.
QUESTION: Now, does that mean no conditions for going to the Mitchell
Plan?
SECRETARY POWELL: The United States is not in a position to impose
upon either of the two sides specific conditions. We can encourage
them. Israel is a democratic nation, freely elected leaders, that
makes their judgment. We can encourage, we can prod both sides, and
Mr. Arafat, as the leader of the Palestinian Authority.
We do encourage and prod both sides to move both of them in a
direction where we can get the violence down, confidence built back up
between them, trust restored, so that we can start into the Mitchell
Plan and get to negotiations, which is the sole purpose of the
Mitchell Plan.
QUESTION: But Mr. Secretary you've been saying that since the first
interview we had here in February.
SECRETARY POWELL: And I'm sorry, it hasn't changed since the first
interview I gave in February. The violence has continued. It's time to
bring an end to the violence. And until that violence is ended, we're
not going to get forward movement into the Mitchell Plan.
QUESTION: Thank you. Thank you so much for being with us, Secretary
Powell.
SECRETARY POWELL: Thank you, Cokie.
(end transcript)
(Distributed by the Office of International Information Programs, U.S.
Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list