UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Military

SLUG: 5-50478 Terror/ Euro Laws
DATE:
NOTE NUMBER:

DATE=11/09/01

TYPE=BACKGROUND REPORT

NUMBER=5-50478

TITLE=TERROR / EURO LAWS

BYLINE=ROGER WILKISON

DATELINE=BRUSSELS

VOICED AT:

///EDS: REISSUED TO CORRECT BKR NUMBER IN HEADER///

/// EDS: THIS IS THE LAST IN A SIX-PART SERIES. THE STORIES CAN ALSO BE USED SEPARATELY. ///

INTRO: The recent terrorist attacks on the United States have spurred European countries into taking radical measures to improve law enforcement and judicial cooperation against terrorism. V-O-A correspondent Roger Wilkison reports European governments, acting individually and as a bloc, are boosting the powers of their police and judiciary. The European Union is moving to adopt a Europe-wide arrest warrant that it hopes will dramatically streamline cross-border investigations.

TEXT: The September 11th attacks have galvanized European governments into reviewing laws that make it easy for terrorists to operate both within their countries' borders and across those borders.

Italy last month pushed through a decree widening the authority of police and magistrates to go after suspected terrorists. One of its measures allows police to carry out wiretaps, phone-taps and computer-taps without the authorization of judicial authorities.

Germany, which until now has only defined groups planning attacks on German soil as illegal terrorist organizations, plans to extend that to organizations plotting strikes against foreign targets. That comes after evidence that a Hamburg-based cell planned and carried out the attacks on New York and Washington. Germany also wants to exempt extremist Islamic organizations that advocate violence from the country's freedom of religion statutes.

Britain, too, is considering expanding its definition of illegal incitement to include religious as well as racial hatred in order to deal with Muslim leaders who take advantage of the country's freedoms to preach violence.

All of this is sure to please the French, who have the longest experience in fighting Islamic terrorism. Under a 1986 law, France created special anti-terrorism prosecutors, magistrates and no-jury courts to try suspected terrorists. Police are allowed to detain suspects without firm evidence and hold them for up to four days. France has convicted more than 200 people under this law since a series of deadly bombings by radical Algerian insurgents during the mid-1990s.

The most dramatic moves in the new war on terrorism, however, are coming from the European Union. Steven Simon, a former U-S counter-terrorism official now at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London, says the attacks on the United States created a momentum for action on a Europe-wide basis.

/// SIMON ACT ///

There's a move in Brussels to basically harmonize European laws and procedures regarding terrorist investigations and, in particular, with efforts to trace money. We'll see how far those efforts get, but, certainly, you know, the momentum seems to be strong at the moment.

/// END ACT ///

Most significant among the E-U proposals is a plan to create a European arrest warrant that would replace lengthy extradition procedures. Under the plan, if law enforcement officials in Italy, for instance, were hunting a terrorism suspect in Belgium, they would issue a European warrant, and Belgian police would be required to arrest the person and hand him over to Italy within a set period.

E-U justice ministers are now under pressure from their heads of state and government to reach agreement by early next month on a common definition of terrorism and common sentences for terrorist offenses.

Security analyst Matthew Dunn, at Control Risk Group in London, says those measures -- and the Europe-wide arrest warrant -- will help law enforcement authorities deal more speedily with suspected terrorists.

/// DUNN ACT ///

It should improve the situation. So you won't have a situation where the French government claims that the people it wants to investigate are living happily in London and, in some cases, even claiming benefits from the British government.

/// END ACT ///

Under normal circumstances, E-U justice ministers would spend months or even years working out common definitions for the offenses covered in the European arrest warrant and minimum and maximum sentences for terrorist crimes. But the attacks against the United States forced E-U leaders to lock the ministers into a December 7th deadline. The European Union has declared the arrest warrant a central plank of its own anti-terrorist action plan.

Still, analyst Jonathan Stevenson, of the International Institute of Strategic Studies in London, cautions against supposing that anything subject to E-U debate and the E-U legislative process is going to happen soon.

/// STEVENSON ACT ///

If and when it does happen, I do think it will improve somewhat transnational cooperation in anti-terrorist enforcement. But I do think the de-facto mobilization in the wake of September 11th has already created connections than are better than those that existed before. But it's going to take a concerted engagement on the part of the United States and its allied governments to try to crystallize this de-facto mobilization into sort of a standing institutional readiness.

/// END ACT ///

A top Italian magistrate agrees with Mr. Stevenson, saying the September 11th attacks gave the European plan a formidable push. But he says it is still too early to know whether the surge of support for the common arrest warrant is merely an emotional reaction that will disappear once the haggling over details starts. (Signed)

NEB/RW/KL/MAR



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list