Gayle Smith, Senior Director for African Affairs and Susan Rice,
Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Press Briefing,
Nicon Hilton, Abuja, Nigeria Released by the Office of the Press
Secretary The White House, August 27, 2000
QUESTION: Do you have more details on what they discussed, on
what President Obasanjo and President Clinton discussed about
Sierra Leone and Liberia, on exactly what the concerns were that
they shared in their session?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY RICE: Well, as you know, the issue of Sierra
Leone and how we can work with the Nigerian government and the
West African subregion to bring lasting peace and stability has
been a constant theme in our discussions over the last several
months.
Today, the focus was on two things. One, how to go about
accelerating our shared efforts to beef up the U.N. force to our
train and equip program, how to accelerate that and how to put it
in place to provide a forceful military component to the larger
strategy of assisting the government of Sierra Leone to regain
control over all of its territory and all of its resources.
Secondly, they talked about some of the actors that stand in the
way of achieving that goal, players inside Sierra Leone and in
the subregion, and affirmed their interest in working together
with other constructive leaders in the region to bolster the
peace in Sierra Leone and limit the influence of those who may
wish to create more difficulties.
QUESTION: (Inaudible) --
ASSISTANT SECRETARY RICE: Well, on Liberia, we have a shared
concern about the role that Liberia has played in Sierra Leone in
arms trafficking and diamond smuggling. And that's an issue
about which we have been very vocal in recent weeks and months
and it remains a very serious shared concern.
QUESTION: What's your latest understanding of what the
President's going to be witness to in Tanzania? Will there be
any kind of agreement signed, or is it going to go past the
deadline that Mandela has set?
MS. SMITH: President Clinton is going to Arusha in support of
President Mandela, as you all know. President Mandela is in
Arusha now. For the last several days he has been meeting with
the Burundian parties, and he is doing so in Arusha today and
tomorrow. And obviously, he will take it as far as he believes
that he can.
We are very much looking at the stop in Arusha as a way to
support the process and President Mandela's leadership of it, but
also to, with him, consolidate the progress that has been
achieved thus far. If you look at the overall agreement, which I
think it's probably better to describe as a framework, there has
been considerable agreement made over the last year, and prior to
that by President Nyerere. There are outstanding issues, but
there are people sitting in the same room talking today which a
year ago they wouldn't have even thought of sitting in the same
room and talking.
So we hope that that agreement can be consolidated. If it can be
move further, fine; but President Clinton's purpose in going vis
a vis the Burundians is very much to send a message that they
have made progress, we support that progress, that the violence
needs to end, and that we recognize that this is a very, very
long-term proposition.
QUESTION: It is not yet known whether the agreement will be
done by Monday?
MS. SMITH: The level to which they will have full agreement will
be the outcome of President Mandela's meetings. But I would
underscore something here, which is that the progress that has
been made thus far I think is, in our view, extremely positive.
So if they're able to get further, great; if they maintain it
where they are, again, if you look at where this has come from,
the progress has been marked. But the other side is also true.
This will not be fully resolved by next week, or next month, or
even next year. It's a very complex conflict and it's going to
take a great deal of time to unravel it.
QUESTION: A question related to the peacekeeping training that
is supposedly going to take place. There's a report today that
some British soldiers were taken hostage in Sierra Leone. Do you
think -- have you heard anything about that? Does that
underscore the need for African countries to handle this? Does
it underscore the danger that Western countries face in trying to
handle these matters themselves?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY RICE: The details we have are rather limited
on the specific situation of the British soldiers. But it
neither sends any particular message about Western involvement in
Africa, nor does it call into question any of the significant
steps that we've all decided to take together to strengthen the
U.N. presence in Sierra Leone. On the contrary; it shows that
that there are elements very active in Sierra Leone that are
determined to perpetuate instability, and the British have led
the way, along with the United Nations, with the support of many
others, including the United States and the international
community and, of course, Nigeria, to strengthen the
international presence in Sierra Leone to diminish the capacity
of those who wish to wreak violence and destabilize the
situation. So that's an effort that we have to continue now more
than ever.
###
NEWSLETTER
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list
|
|