UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Military



DATE=6/30/2000 TYPE=CORRESPONDENT REPORT TITLE=SRI LANKA CENSORSHIP (L-ONLY) NUMBER=2-263923 BYLINE=STEVEN BARTHOLOMEUSZ DATELINE=COLOMBO CONTENT= VOICED AT: INTRO: Sri Lanka's Supreme Court ruled Friday the government's censorship of news illegal, and ordered the reopening of a newspaper shut down under emergency regulations. Steven Bartholomeusz reports from Colombo on this landmark decision. TEXT: The Sri Lankan Supreme Court, delivering its judgment, said the government censorship, imposed in May, is illegal. It also said the appointment of a Chief Censor, to review all news reports, had not been approved in Parliament within seven days. The three-judge bench said the Chief Censor, Ariya Rubasinghe, did not have the authority to censor news reports or close down the English language "Sunday Leader" newspaper in May. The Supreme court ordered the reopening of the Sunday Leader and its Sinhalese language sister paper, shut down under the emergency regulations, and ordered the state to pay 100-thousand rupees in compensation to the newspaper group. The Editor of the Sunday Leader, Lasantha Wickrametunge, hailed the Supreme Court decision saying it was a victory for the freedom of the press, and said the paper planned to begin publishing on Sunday. The newspaper was banned for six months after it ran a front-page report on the war that used the word "not" in every sentence to avoid the censor. In May, the government put the country on a war footing and imposed strict censorship on news reports of the war and other government related matters, after a string of setbacks in its battles against Tamil rebels in the North of the island nation. The strict regulations allowed the government to seize property, close down printing presses and ban the publication of newspapers. Under the censorship, all Sri Lankan news media and until early June, the foreign media, had to submit reports connected to the war to the government censor, who would delete information that was thought to jeopardize the fighting or create public distress. The decision to impose censorship drew criticism from both local and international news organizations and media watchdogs. (SIGNED) NEB/SB/PLM TEXT: NEB/WTW/ 30-Jun-2000 08:21 AM EDT (30-Jun-2000 1221 UTC) NNNN Source: Voice of America .





NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list