DATE=5/15/2000
TYPE=CORRESPONDENT REPORT
TITLE=BRITAIN / SIERRA LEONE (L)
NUMBER=2-262384
BYLINE=EVANS HAYS
DATELINE=LONDON
CONTENT=
VOICED AT:
INTRO: The British government says it has no
intention of committing its troops to a combat role in
Sierra Leone's civil war. V-O-A's Evans Hays in
London reports British Defense Secretary Geoff Hoon
outlined the government position during remarks
(Monday) in Parliament.
TEXT: Mr. Hoon said the British government has a
clear and unambiguous policy for its troops in Sierra
Leone - to secure the international airport at the
capital, Freetown, and to evacuate civilians.
The defense secretary was responding to critics who
charge that the British government has no clear policy
on Sierra Leone. Some members of the opposition
Conservative Party have expressed concern that British
troops may become a full participant in the war.
Mr. Hoon dismissed these concerns.
/// HOON ACT ///
British forces were deployed to allow the safe
evacuation of British nationals and other
entitled personnel. Essential to this has been
the task of securing (Freetown's) Lungi Airport,
which as the (British) foreign secretary said,
will be extremely valuable in allowing United
Nations forces to build up to their mandated
strength over the next month.
/// END ACT ///
The defense secretary said that while British troops
are not intended to take on a combat role, they can
defend themselves as needed, and have the firepower to
do so.
In a reference to the duration of the British military
role in Sierra Leone, Mr. Hoon dismissed fears by some
that the troops are on an open-ended mission.
/// HOON ACT TWO //
I recognize that there have been questions about
the length of our commitment. The United
Nations plan to build up their forces to their
authorized level of about 11-thousand over the
next month. We would expect that once the
United Nations mission has been reinforced by
these troops, our role at the airport would no
longer be required. I can assure the House (of
Commons) that U-K forces will stay no longer
than is necessary.
/// END ACT ///
But the defense secretary said a military pullout
would not mean an end to Britain's diplomatic and
political support for both the United Nations and for
Sierra Leone. (SIGNED)
NEB/EH/JWH/RAE
15-May-2000 13:30 PM EDT (15-May-2000 1730 UTC)
NNNN
Source: Voice of America
.
NEWSLETTER
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list
|
|