UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Military



DATE=3/10/2000 TYPE=BACKGROUND REPORT TITLE=YUGOSLAV WAR CRIMES TRIAL NUMBER=5-45615 BYLINE=LAUREN COMITEAU DATELINE=THE HAGUE CONTENT= VOICED AT: INTRO: On Monday morning, a top military leader goes on trial at the Yugoslav war crimes tribunal. Bosnian Serb General Radislav Krstic is charged with genocide for commanding the execution of thousands of Muslims after the fall of the United Nations-declared safe area of Srebrenica in 1995. Lauren Comiteau has more from The Hague on what is likely to be the tribunal's most highly-publicized trial to date. TEXT: Srebrenica. The name of this town once known for its silver mines has become almost synonymous with slaughter. It was the scene of the worst massacres in Europe since the Holocaust. Five years ago, Bosnian Serbs overran the enclave in eastern Bosnia, which the United Nations had declared a safe haven. Thousands of Muslim men and boys were killed over the course of 5 days. Now for the first time, prosecutors say they have someone in a position of power to answer for those crimes. /// ACT: READING OF INDICTMENT, DEFENDANT ANSWERS THROUGH INTERPRETER /// The prosecutor of the international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia charges Radislav Krstic with genocide, crimes against humanity, and violations of the laws and customs of war. Do you plead guilty or not guilty? [Serbian] I plead not guilty. /// END ACT /// General Radislav Krstic was arrested by NATO-led troops in Bosnia more than a year ago. Prosecutors have charged him with genocide, extermination and deportation -- all crimes the general has pled not guilty to. But prosecutors say General Krstic was promoted to commander of the Drina Corps during the massacres, and it was his troops who helped eliminate the Bosnian Muslim population of Srebrenica. According to court documents, defense lawyers will argue that the general and his troops were not in Srebrenica during the massacres, and he did not take up his command until after the slaughter. But prosecutors say they have placed General Krstic at the scene of the crimes, when men were separated from women and children, loaded onto buses, taken to warehouses, fields, schools and cultural centers, then executed and buried in mass graves. They say General Krstic reported directly to the Bosnian Serb military commander, General Ratko Mladic. /// ACT: TV SOUNDTRACK WITH GENERAL MLADIC CALLING TO KRSTIC, "COME ON, KRSTIC" -- ESTABLISH AND FADE /// Footage from Bosnian Serb television shows General Mladic entering Srebrenica on July 11th, 1995, accompanied by General Krstic. It is evidence like this that could help prosecutors prove that General Krstic was in a position of authority and could have prevented the crimes. Prosecution spokesman Paul Risley says the case against General Krstic will focus largely on proving that he commanded the troops that committed the slaughter. Most accounts of the events at Srebrenica say about eight-thousand men are still missing and presumed dead. Prosecutors have never given their own figures, but that should change, says Paul Risley, at the General's trial. /// RISLEY ACT /// I can certainly tell you that the magnitude of the forensic evidence is certainly the same as the journalistic reporting that occurred five years ago, when these massacres occurred. We will be able to place precise numbers and very clear photographic and forensic evidence of the nature of the crimes committed and -- perhaps just as importantly -- the very clear and deliberate efforts to cover up those crimes that were undertaken by the Bosnian Serb military in the years that followed the massacre. /// END ACT /// The case for a cover-up will include evidence that the firwst mass graves were dug up, and remains moved to secondary sites. Investigators have been excavating gravesites since 1996; General Krstic's trial will be the first time prosecutors reveal the number of bodies they have found. There are many other questions that people watching this trial are hoping the evidence will answer. The women of Srebrenica are still waiting for word of what happened to their husbands and sons. The Dutch, too, are following this trial closely. It was Dutch peacekeepers stationed in Srebrenica who did not -- or could not -- stop the crimes, sparking years of internal debate and investigations into their own role in the Srebrenica slaughter. Marjolijn de Cocq is editor of foreign news at the Netherlands press association. She says Srebrenica has become a stain on the soul of the Dutch, who see this trial as partly their own. /// DE COCQ ACT /// It's about, will there be new evidence that kind of absolves the Dutch that they are not guilty of what happened there? Or is there evidence that shows the Dutch are guilty, that they should have intervened, they should have done something to prevent the massacre that happened there? /// END ACT /// The Dutch are currently conducting their own investigations into what happened at Srebrenica. The United Nations has also tried to answer some of these questions. In a report released last year, the organization said the tragedy occurred, in part, because its own officials failed to recognize the scope of evil facing Srebrenica's Muslims from Serb forces. But this is the first time a criminal court is charging one high-ranking individual with responsibility for the crimes, and all eyes are watching and waiting to see the evidence. Those watching include, no doubt, Radovan Karadzic, the former leader of the Bosnian Serbs, and his top general, Ratko Mladic. They also have been charged with genocide for the crimes at Srebrenica. And prosecutors insist that they, too, will one day end up in The Hague, facing the same war crimes tribunal as General Radislav Krstic. (Signed) NEB/LC/GE/WTW 10-Mar-2000 12:56 PM EDT (10-Mar-2000 1756 UTC) NNNN Source: Voice of America .





NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list