
February 3, 1999
ANGOLA'S 'DIRTY WAR': BOTH SIDES MUST RETURN TO THE CONFERENCE TABLE
With Jonas Savimbi's rebel UNITA (National Union for the Total Independence of Angola) seizing town after town closer to Luanda and President dos Santos promising during his new government's swearing-in to smash the rebel movement once and for all, African observers expressed dire concern that Angola's decades-long civil war has again escalated. Most writers concluded, along with Lagos's independent Post Express, that "it is too late for either UNITA or the Angolan government in Luanda to expect a clear military victory in the conflict" and that "the best way to resolve these conflicts remains in the time-tested resort to the conference table." Both sides were urged to show more of a willingness "to make concessions" in order to end hostilities. Ouagadougou's independent Le Pays opined that, in fact, the best chance for Angola's future lies in "the emergence of a new political elite." These were additional themes:
UN'S DEPARTURE: Most papers strongly opposed the curtailment of UN operations in Angola, as recommended by Secretary General Kofi Annan. Harare's government-controlled Daily Chronicle called the UN's departure "a naked demonstration of the most monumental abdication of responsibilities...as peacemaker, to the forces of evil." Ouagadougou's independent Le Pays opined, "If the 'mouthing off' of Mr. Santos can be justified because the UN is nothing but an instrument in the hands of the United States, and because of this, cannot guarantee peace, it still remains true that by its presence, it [the UN] served at least as an observatory for humanitarian aid, gave security to those who provided this aid and constituted an alarm for the people in distress." A Nigerian daily pleaded for the "UN to quickly return to the scene in Angola."
OUTSIDE INTERVENTION: Observers' gravest criticism, however, was reserved for the alleged involvement of outsiders--including Zambia, Namibia, international diamond mining interests and Cuba. Pundits charged that by arming the belligerents--in most cases the UNITA war machine--outsiders had prolonged Angola's "dirty war" in which "civilian populations pay the high price" of the conflict. Lusaka's church-affilated weekly National Mirror called on the UN, the OAU and the Southern African Development Community to initiate "a full-scale inquiry" into Angola's allegations that Zambia is supplying arms to UNITA. Windhoek's independent Republikein 2000 remarked that Namibians should not be surprised if indeed Namibian soldiers are fighting in the Angolan civil war on the side of the government's MPLA (Popular Movement for the Liberation of Angola), and warned Namibia's leaders not to look "so far beyond our borders that they stumble over the country's problems." The South African media reported that 2,000 Cuban soldiers are alleged to be deployed in Angola to assist the MPLA government. Pretoria's Afrikaans-language, centrist Beeld commented that to introduce such a foreign element would make the situation that much more volatile.
This survey is based on 9 reports from 7 countries, January 20-February 3.
EDITOR: Gail Hamer Burke
|  AFRICA  |   
AFRICA
BOTSWANA: "Weep For Angola" The independent Gazette implored (1/20): "Weep for the generation of Angolans
who have never known
peace since they embarked upon their war of liberation from Portuguese colonial rule in 1961.
Weep for
the tens of thousands of Angolans who have lost their limbs to the millions of land mines
scattered
indiscriminately across the countryside. Weep for the children who have never been to school;
who have
spent their childhood fleeing from village to village, from town to town as war ranged back and
forth.
But above all, we should weep tears of frustration over the impotence of the United Nations,
which has
allowed the peace negotiated in 1994 to disappear. "Angola is a rich prize. With the huge resources of oil, diamonds and other minerals and a
fertile
agricultural environment. It is no wonder that America fought a proxy war in that country using
apartheid South African troops to keep the country from falling under the control of the former
Soviet
Union, which in turn used proxy Cuban troops in their ideological battle against the United
States. The
Organization of African Unity failed to broker peace and, true to form, buried its head in the
sand.
SADC was also helpless because some members continued to support Savimbi.... There are very
strong
suspicions that business interests with their eye on Angolan diamonds continue to supply the
bandit army
with weapons and other supplies. Unless these channels of support can be cut, then there is little
hope
that Savimbi will be defeated. This is why it is particularly disappointing that the UN
peace-keeping
force was unable to stop supplies from reaching Savimbi or even making any serious attempts at
identifying sources of Savimbi's financial and material aid. The UN spent over $1 billion in its
four years
in Angola for nothing. The ball is therefore back in our own court, and we appeal to SADC
countries to
start an initiative to bring peace to Angola before a second generation grows up knowing only
war." BURKINA FASO: "Needed: The Emergence Of A New Political
Class" Independent Le Pays commented in its rubric, "Internal Dialogue" (2/3): "If the
'mouthing off' of Mr.
Santos can be justified because the UN is nothing but an instrument in the hands of the United
States, and
because of this, cannot guarantee peace, it still remains true that by its presence, it [the UN]
served at
least as an observatory for humanitarian aid, gave security to those who provided this aid and
constituted
an alarm for the people in distress. In any case, the chances for peace in Angola reside in
keeping in the
backroom the old political class and for the future the emergence of a new political elite." "Angola, The Dirty War" Satirical weekly Le Journal du Jeudi held (1/28), "In this new logic of war, it is
again the civil
populations who will pay the high price. It is more than time for the international community to
mobilize
further if it wants to avoid innocent people paying for the deadly madness of men avid for power.
The
United Nations is particularly called on to bring down the mistrust that exists between the two
parties. If
by the repatriation of its Blue Helmets [the UN] has created the first failure, its responsibilities
will be
even greater should the logic of war become the only alternative." NAMIBIA: "Namibia And The Angolan War" Independent Republikein 2000
opined (1/26), "It shouldn't come as a surprise to Namibians, if it comes to
pass that Namibian soldiers are indeed fighting in the Angolan civil war on the side of Mr. Jose
Eduardo
dos Santos' MPLA. It will be surprising if Namibia is not already involved, or that the Congo
cease-fire
is a way out through the back door for Namibia, to get out of Congo and into Angola. Question:
If
President Sam Nujoma's funeral speech is to be taken seriously, it will be [dereliction] of duty if
Mr.
Nujoma doesn't assist the MPLA government. There is no political maneuvering which Mr.
Nujoma can
offer not to come to MPLA's assistance, especially compared to the reasons why Namibia came
to
Kabila's assistance. Since Namibia proved in the DROC involvement that it can't be
trusted...circumstantial evidence will do in the case of Angola.... Mr. Nujoma claimed that
Namibia's
own security was the reason for his involvement in the DROC.... Angola is a neighbor...and the
war in
Angola threatens Namibia's peace more than the rebellion in Congo.... That there are better
reasons to
help MPLA than Kabila, doesn't mean Namibia must give assistance.... Namibian leaders
mustn't look so
far beyond our borders that they stumble over the country's problems." NIGERIA: "Return To The Conference Table" Lagos's independent Post Express
held (2/3), "The best way to resolve these conflicts (in Angola)
remains the time-tested resort to the conference table. The insistence on armed conflict has
failed in the
Angolan instance for far too many years. It is too late for either UNITA or the Angolan
government in
Luanda to expect a clear military victory in the conflict. A bit more talking and a basic
willingness to
make concessions is what the situation requires. Even then, a situation needs to be urgently
restored for
the UN to quickly return to the scene in Angola." SOUTH AFRICA: "2,000 Cubans On The Way?" Afrikaans-language, centrist Beeld held (2/3), "The African and international
communities need to keep a
check on the situation in Angola if the reports that 2,000 Cuban soldiers are on their way there
are true.
Not because 2,000 soldiers might present a danger for the continent or any of its countries, but
the scene
might change if Fidel Castro uses this to gain a foothold in Africa.... The news...must have sent a
shiver
down the neck of many South Africans. The last of the Cubans left in 1989.... The situation in
Angola
nowadays is more or less the same as then.... To throw 2,000 foreign soldiers in that boiling pot
is not a
solution." ZAMBIA: "Take Angola
Threat Seriously" The church-affiliated weekly National Mirror opined (1/23): "The Chiluba
government should take
seriously recent allegations by Angola that Zambia is supplying arms to the rebel UNITA
movement of
Jonas Savimbi.... If the assertions by the Angolans are true--and there is no smoke without
fire--then
there must be some top government leaders involved.... The United Nations, the Organization of
African
Unity and the Southern African Development Community should institute a full-scale inquiry
into the
allegations [as] the persistence of these allegations by Angola shows that it has no faith in this
government, and, therefore, the Lusaka peace protocol that it brokered in order to reach a
cease-fire in
Angola is viewed merely as having been a ruse to divert attention from dirty work going on in
[Zambia's]
backyard." "Nonsensical Allegations" The government-owned Zambia Daily Mail contended (1/20): "Allegations that
Zambia is providing
logistical and military support to the Angolan rebel movement, UNITA, just don't make sense at
all...[since] the need for landlocked Zambia to have genuine peace in all its neighboring countries
is as
real as the effort being made by the country to assist in achieving political serenity in the
region.... All
these accusations are beginning to look like an attempt to draw Zambia into one conflict or
another in the
region. But as already stated, Zambia has no reason to be involved in the [Angola] conflict other
than
through dialogue and it is best that other countries or stakeholders in the conflicts gave peace a
chance
and leave Zambia out of its conflicts." ZIMBABWE: "UN's Stance Questionable" A broadside editorial in the government-controlled Daily Chronicle (1/21) strongly
opposed the
curtailment of UN operations in Angola, as recommended by Secretary General Kofi Annan:
"The UN's
stance on Angola is likely to leave many wondering what this body is for.... Here is a naked
demonstration of the most monumental abdication of responsibilities by the UN, as peacemaker,
to the
forces of evil. To abandon the suffering masses of Angola by pulling out of that country, is
clearly to
pave the way for war rather than doing everything possible, as the progressive world community
would
have expected, to stop war. Not only that, but the UN, by facilitating destructive war through its
departure, is aligning itself with UNITA rebels who have steadfastly refused to honor peace
accords or to
support numerous peace initiatives by either the UN or the OAU. And to state, as Annan is
quoted as
saying, that the Luanda government, like UNITA, does not want to resolve the dispute by
diplomatic
means, is the most amazing thing to come from an African, who should be well aware of with the
real
situation in Angola. Annan's position is at best a sign of deliberate ignorance and, at worst, a
cover-up
for UNITA. If diplomacy has failed in Angola, as indeed it has, it is principally the UN's
diplomacy
which has proved to be toothless because those behind it are probably collaborators of Jonas
Savimbi's
and his bandits. The document on Angola circulated in New York also makes one wonder if it
was
authored by Annan himself or if it was dictated by forces in the West whose decisions hold sway
in the
UN and who have always backed the UNITA rebels." For more information, please contact: U.S. Information Agency Office of Public Liaison Telephone: (202) 619-4355 2/3/99 # # #
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list