
TESTIMONY
OF
LIEUTENANT
GENERAL JAN C. HULY
DEPUTY COMMANDANT PLANS, POLICIES, AND
OPERATIONS
U.S. MARINE CORPS
BEFORE THE
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES
SUBCOMMITTEE ON READINESS
REGARDING
THE FISCAL YEAR 2005 NATIONAL DEFENSE
AUTHORIZATION BUDGET REQUEST -
ASSESSING THE ADEQUACY OF THE FISCAL YEAR
2005 BUDGET TO MEET READINESS NEEDS
March 11, 2004
Introduction
Chairman Hefley,
Congressman Ortiz, distinguished
Members of the Committee; it is
my privilege to report to you on
the state of readiness of your
Marine Corps. Your Marines are
firmly committed to warfighting
excellence, and the support of
the Congress and the American
people has been indispensable to
our success in the Global War on
Terrorism. Your sustained
commitment to improving our
Nation's armed forces to meet
the challenges of today as well
as those of the future is vital
to the security of our Nation.
On behalf of all Marines and
their families, I thank the
Committee for your continued
support and commitment to the
readiness of your Marine Corps.
Recent Operations & Current
Status of Forces
Marine Corps readiness and warfighting capabilities have figured prominently in U.S. military operations since September 2001 and the beginning of the Global War on Terrorism. In Operation Enduring Freedom, sea-based Marines projected power hundreds of miles inland to establish a stronghold deep in enemy territory. During Operation Iraqi Freedom, more than 76,000 Marines (including Reservists), their equipment, and supplies deployed to the Iraqi theater, using a combination of amphibious warships, Maritime Prepositioning Force (MPF) ships, and airlift. Once combat commenced, a Marine Corps combined-arms team advanced more than 450 miles from the sea, to Baghdad and beyond. In 2004, Marine Air-Ground Task Force (MAGTF) flexibility and agility continues to be demonstrated as our Marines stabilize and help to rebuild Iraq and Afghanistan and maintain our commitments afloat and ashore in other world regions.
United States Marines are deployed around the world in 2004 - from Iraq and Afghanistan to Northeast Asia, from the Republic of Georgia to the Horn of Africa, and from the Philippines to Romania. Marines deployed at sea on the warships of Expeditionary Strike Groups are conducting sustained operations ashore in support of U.S. security interests and commitments. Our top priority continues to be to maintain a high state of readiness and to provide forces capable of meeting the demanding needs of the Unified Combatant Commanders and our Nation in the prosecution of the Global War on Terrorism.
Since the end of major combat operations in Iraq, the Marine Corps has been setting the force in order to enhance warfighting readiness for future contingencies. We have reloaded combat equipment and materiel on the ships of the Maritime Prepositioning Force Squadrons while also ensuring that the requirements for Operation Iraqi Freedom II are fulfilled. With our modernization and transformation goals in mind, we are using the funds provided by Congress to repair, refurbish, and where necessary, replace equipment.
Starting in
January, and continuing through
today, the Marine Corps is
deploying forces to relieve the
3d Armored Cavalry Regiment and
the 82d Airborne Division in
Western Iraq in support of
Operation Iraqi Freedom II. In
preparation for this new
mission, we have made a major
effort to analyze lessons
learned from the Iraqi campaign,
and are determining how best to
apply them in the current
operating environment. Included
in this effort is participation
in the Army's Improvised
Explosive Device (IED) Task
Force, a joint effort to share
the technology, as well as the
Tactics, Techniques, and
Procedures (TTP's) of countering
the IED threat.
While the entire force is under
some stress due to increases in
unit Operations Tempo (Optempo),
individual Deployment Tempo (Deptempo),
and the effort to repair and
maintain our equipment, we
continue to meet our operational
commitments. During 2004 Marine
Expeditionary Units will still
deploy as part of Naval
Expeditionary Strike Groups in
support of Combatant Commander
requirements. Units will
continue to deploy to Okinawa
and Iwakuni, Japan. However,
some of those forces will
subsequently deploy from Okinawa
in support of Operation Iraqi
Freedom II. Marine Corps units
continue to support exercises
with our joint and coalition
partners that are critical to
supporting the Combatant
Commanders' Theater Security
Cooperation Plans, and
counter-drug operations in
support of joint and
joint-interagency task forces.
While the operational
tempo remains high, recruiting
and retention continue to meet
our manpower goals. We are
continually monitoring the
health of our Service, and we
are focused on ensuring that the
Marine Corps remains ready for
all current and future
missions.
People and
leadership are the foundations
of the Marine Corps' readiness
and warfighting capabilities.
Operation Iraqi Freedom
demonstrated that the Marine
Corps' recruiting, training, and
continued emphasis on education
of the force are extremely
successful in maintaining the
high standards of military
readiness our Nation requires.
The Marine Corps remains
committed to taking care of our
Marines, their families, and our
civilian Marines.
Marines
This past year demonstrated once again that the most important weapon on any battlefield is the individual Marine. While the employment of precision weapons and advanced technologies provide us unique advantages over our adversaries, our key to battlefield success remains educated, highly skilled, and motivated Marines. During Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom, our small-unit leaders' skills, adaptability, and flexibility produced victory on fluid, uncertain and chaotic battlefields. The Marine Corps will continue to recruit, train, and retain the type of individuals who brought us success in these and many other operations. Consequently, in the coming years some of our most important readiness efforts will revolve around individual Marines and their families. This will be a challenge, especially in times of war, when we call upon our Marines and their families to make significant sacrifices. We must, therefore, pursue our major Quality of Life priorities - pay and compensation, health care, bachelor and family housing, infrastructure and installation management, and community services - that contribute to maintaining the stability of the force, enhance personal readiness and family cohesion, and promote retention.
Personnel
Tempo (Perstempo).
As of February 27, 2004, the
Marine Corps had 1,994 active
component and 2,111 reserve
component Marines who have
exceeded the 400 out of the
preceding 730 days Deptempo
threshold. Currently, there are
42,721 active component and
17,099 reserve component Marines
who have accrued at least one
day of Deptempo. Prior to
September 2001, the Marine Corps
maintained a 2.7:1 unit-level
rotation ratio. As a result of
the current operational demands
associated with the Global War
on Terrorism, Marine Corps units
are rotating at a higher rate.
The increase in rotation rates
will result in an increase in
Deptempo. The degree to which
the increase in unit-level
rotation will affect retention
depends on the duration of the
increased level of Deptempo. To
date, we have no evidence that
the increase in Deptempo has
adversely affected retention.
Recruiting.
Successful recruiting is
essential to replenishing the
force and maintaining a high
state of readiness. Sustaining
our ranks with the highest
quality young men and women is
the mission of the Marine Corps
Recruiting Command. Recruiting
Command has accomplished this
mission for more than eight
years for enlisted recruiting
and 13 years for officer
recruiting. This past year the
Marine Corps recruited over 100
percent of its goal with over 97
percent Tier I High School
graduates. The Marine Corps
Reserve achieved its Fiscal Year
2003 recruiting goals with the
accession of 6,174 Non-Prior
Service Marines and 2,663 Prior
Service Marines. This year, as
force structures are developed
to pursue the Global War on
Terrorism, your support is
essential in arming our
recruiters with the resources
they need to ensure the
readiness of your Marine Corps.
Retention. Retaining our
best and brightest Marines is
key to readiness. Retention
success is partly a consequence
of the investment we make in
supporting our operational
forces - giving our Marines what
they need to do their jobs in
the field, as well as the funds
required to educate and train
these phenomenal young men and
women. Our First Term Alignment
Plan (first tour) has achieved
its reenlistment requirements
for the past nine years. With
just over one-third of the
current Fiscal Year completed,
we have achieved 76 percent of
our first-term retention goal
for the year. Furthermore, our
Subsequent Term Alignment Plan
(second tour and beyond) reveals
that we have already retained 47
percent of our goal for this
Fiscal Year. Officer
retention is at a 19 year high,
continuing a four-year trend of
increasing retention. Despite
increased retention overall,
certain Military Occupational
Specialties continue to suffer
perennially high attrition,
examples include Aviation
Electronics Technicians,
Electronic Maintenance
Technicians, and Public
Affairs. We are
attempting to overcome this
challenge by offering
continuation pay for those
Marines with Military
Occupational Specialties that
are in short supply. Military
compensation to all Marines that
is competitive with the private
sector provides the flexibility
required to meet the challenge
of maintaining stability in
manpower.
Marine Corps
Reserve.
Our Reserve Marines are a vital
and critical element of our
Total Force. The training,
leadership, and quality of life
of our reserve component remain
significant Marine Corps
priorities. In 2003, the Marine
Corps Reserve rapidly mobilized
combat ready Marines to augment
the active component. Marine
Corps Reserve activations in
support of Operation Iraqi
Freedom began in January 2003,
and peaked at 21,316 Reserve
Marines on active duty in May
2003. Of the approximately
6,000 Reservists currently on
active duty, over 1,300
Individual Mobilization
Augmentees, Individual Ready
Reserves, and Retirees fill
critical joint and internal
billets. As of March 1, 2004,
we had 5,398 Marines mobilized;
4,114 in Selected Marine Corps
Reserve units and 1,284
Individual Augmentees, and we
have an additional 7,500 Marines
that will be mobilized for our
Operation IRAQI FREEDOM II
requirements. Judicious
employment of Reserve Marines
remains a top priority of the
Marine Corps to ensure the
Marine Corps Reserve maintains
the capability to augment and
reinforce the active component.
Our Reserve units and
individuals are combat ready and
have rapidly integrated into
active forces commands
demonstrating the effectiveness
of the Marine Corps Total Force.
Marine Corps Reserve units
maintain high levels of
pre-mobilization readiness.
Reserve Units consistently train
to a high readiness standard.
Ninety-eight percent of SMCR
Marines called up for duty
reported for mobilization and
less than one percent requested
a deferment, delay, or
exemption. The Marine Corps
Reserve executed a rapid and
efficient mobilization with
units averaging six days from
notification to being
deployment-ready, and 32 days
after receiving a deployment
order they arrived in theater.
Similar to the
active component, the challenge
for the reserve component is
managing the high demand/low
density specialties such as
Civil Affairs, KC-130, military
police, and intelligence. To
date, 96 percent of the Civil
Affairs, 989 percent of the
KC-130, 72 percent of law
enforcement, and 69 percent of
the intelligence Marines have
been activated as compared to 50
percent of reserve infantry
Marines. Building on the
important lessons of the last
year, the Marine Corps is
pursuing several
transformational initiatives to
enhance the Reserves'
capabilities as an even more
ready and able partner with our
active component. These pending
initiatives include: increasing
the number of Military Police
units in the reserve component;
establishing a Reserve
Intelligence Support Battalion
that includes placing Reserve
Marine Intelligence Detachments
at the Joint Reserve
Intelligence Centers; returning
some of our Civil Affairs
structure to the active
component to provide enhanced
planning capabilities to the
operational and Service
Headquarters; and introducing an
improved Individual Augmentee
Management Program to meet the
growing joint and internal
requirements.
End Strength.
The Marine Corps is assimilating
last year's congressionally
authorized increase in Marine
Corps end-strength to 175,000.
The increase of 2,400 Marines
authorized by Congress addressed
an urgent need to train and
maintain enough Marines for the
long-term requirements
associated with the Global War
on Terrorism. It has been
particularly important in
enabling us to provide the
Nation with the 4th
Marine Expeditionary Brigade
(Anti-Terrorism), a robust,
scalable force specifically
dedicated to anti-terrorism.
As the Marine Corps is expeditionary by nature, we are accustomed to deploying in support of contingency and forward presence missions. We are structured in such a way as to satisfy our enduring requirements and meet operational contingencies as long as the contingencies are temporary in nature. We do not believe, at the present time, that an end strength increase is necessary.
Quality of Life. As an expeditionary force, the Marine Corps conducts frequent and sometimes lengthy deployments, and our senior leadership is focused on understanding and mitigating the effects of these deployments on recruitment, readiness, retention, and family life. For example, in recognition of the importance of the transition home for both Marines and their families, the Marine Corps developed a standardized return and reunion program in coordination with Marine Corps Community Services (MCCS) personnel, health professionals, and chaplains. The program was implemented in March 2003, and was specifically designed to ease the assimilation of service members back into family life following long periods of separation, as well as provide information on the additional support programs offered in support of deploying service members and their families. The program consists of a mandatory warrior transition brief for the returning Marine, a return and reunion guidebook for Marines and family members, a caregiver brief, and briefs designed for spouses.
The Marine Corps
will continue to look at our
unique demographics (e.g., the
youth of the force, number of
children/ spouses, number of
single parents, number of
relocations/forward deployed
Marines) in a holistic manner
and adjust QOL programs to
provide the counseling and
support needed before, during,
and after deployments. The
primary focus must be on
prevention so that intervention
requirements are decreased. The
Marine Corps continues to
monitor the attitudes and
concerns of Marines and family
members relative to their QOL as
we provide support during the
global war on terrorism. We
remain committed to improving
the standard of living in the
Corps and ensuring that the "QOL
benefit" is clearly articulated
to our Marines and families.
Training
Superior training has always been a hallmark of your Marine Corps. Our training with the resources you provide enables us to maintain the high state of readiness demanded of your Nation's expeditionary force in readiness. In terms of operational deployments, 2003 was the busiest year since 1991. Consequently, most service exercises were cancelled and participation in exercises throughout the world was reduced, with the exception of the Pacific region. In that area, Marines embarked onboard the USS Fort McHenry (LSD 43) participated in the Cooperation Afloat Readiness and Training (LF CARAT) exercise sponsored by the Commander, US Pacific Command, engaging in a series of bilateral training exercises in the Southeast Asian littoral region. At home, the Marine Corps resumed service exercises as forces began to deploy for training within the continental United States. Combined Arms Exercises (CAX) at Twenty-nine Palms, California; Mountain Warfare Training Center (MWTC) courses in Bridgeport, California; Weapons and Tactics Instructor (WTI) courses in Yuma, Arizona; and MEU(SOC) work-ups began in earnest to prepare recently redeployed forces for scheduled or emergent deployments. These exercises also served to evaluate individual and unit proficiency, and ultimately to maintain the readiness and operational primacy of Marine Air-Ground Task Forces across the spectrum of operations.
Operation Iraqi Freedom II Pre-deployment Training. While we endeavor to keep a keen edge on our warfighting skills, the mission before us in Iraq requires an emphasis on Security and Stability Operations (SASO). We have adjusted our training to meet this challenge. In preparation for Operation Iraqi Freedom II, I Marine Expeditionary Force has analyzed lessons learned from their experiences in conducting security and stability operations from March to September 2003, and from recent Army lessons learned. As they did last year, I Marine Expeditionary Force is working closely with the Army forces in Iraq. They have conducted a number of liaison visits with the Army units they will soon relieve. They have drawn lessons from the tactics of the British in Iraq, which reflects many years of experience in low intensity conflicts and peacekeeping operations; procedures used by the Los Angeles Police Department for neighborhood patrolling in gang dominated areas; as well as study of the Marine Corps' own extensive "Small Wars" experience. Our deploying units have applied these lessons through a comprehensive training package that includes tactics, techniques, procedures for stability and counter-insurgency operations. We have conducted rigorous urban operations training and exercises. Over 400 Marines are receiving Arabic language immersion training, and all deploying Marines and Sailors are receiving extensive cultural education. Our supporting establishment is focused on the equipment, logistics, and training requirements of this force - paying particular attention to individual protective equipment, enhanced vehicle and aircraft hardening, and aviation survivability equipment and procedures. Marine aviation elements have worked closely with Army aviation and their recent Iraq experience. This exchange facilitated an advanced aviation tactics exercise focused on mitigating the threats in the current operating environment to tactical aviation. This type of training and support is critical as we send Marines back to war in a volatile, dangerous, and changing situation.
Training at Eglin
Air Force Base.
Training at Eglin Air Force Base
(AFB) is envisioned to provide a
near term pre-deployment
training capability for East
Coast Navy Amphibious Ready
Groups/Expeditionary Strike
Groups and Marine Expeditionary
Units (Special Operations
Capable), with the potential to
be part of the long-term
solution. The training concept
was designed for up to two
10-day training periods per
year. The long-term objective
is that during each 10-day
period, the Expeditionary Strike
Groups will be able to conduct
training across the full
spectrum of operational
requirements. The Marine Corps
has invested approximately $4.2
million in environmental
assessment/mitigation and
infrastructure development
required to establish an initial
training capability at Eglin
AFB.
In December 2003, the Marine
Corps completed its first 10-day
training period at Eglin AFB.
The Marine Corps is assessing
the quality of the training
available at Eglin AFB to
determine whether training there
merits the expenditure of
additional effort and
resources. Meanwhile, we
continue to explore and develop
other options, both within the
United States and abroad. While
Eglin AFB has the potential to
meet Naval Expeditionary Force
training requirements, full
development of this capability
on a major range and test
facility base will require a
significant investment by the
Department of the Navy and
Department of Defense to upgrade
existing facilities, as well as
changes to existing regulations
governing test facilities.
Range
Modernization.
Rigorous, realistic training is
crucial to combat readiness. We
are building a comprehensive
plan to sustain, upgrade, and
modernize our ranges and
training areas. Virtual and
simulated training scenarios and
technology are increasingly
important and add great value to
the complete training program
for Marines. However, live-fire
combined arms training and
maneuver forms the core of our
combat training programs.
The program to modernize our
live-training capabilities will
provide both operating forces
and installations the management
tools and resources to better
plan and execute training and to
honor our commitments as good
stewards of our training lands.
The goal of our range
modernization program is to
preserve and enhance the
live-fire combined arms training
capabilities of Marine
Air-Ground Task Force Training
Command, Twenty-nine Palms and
Marine Corps Air Station, Yuma,
and to preserve the
unit-training capabilities of
the nation's two premier
littoral training areas, Camp
Lejeune and Camp Pendleton.
Equipment Status
The Marine Corps objective in setting the force for Operation Iraqi Freedom and global commitments is to maintain a high state of preparedness. This will take time and resources. Aviation units deploying or deployed in support of the Global War on Terrorism are maintaining mission capability rates above 85 percent. The remaining units are operating at slightly lower levels due to the aircraft parts priority being established for our forward deployed squadrons. Our four divisions are currently making steady improvements in equipment readiness because of the remarkable maintenance and repair efforts of our Marines, depot workers, and the support of Congress.
During Operation Iraqi Freedom, the Marine Corps offloaded two Maritime Prepostitioning Squadrons (11 ships). Our equipment offloaded from Maritime Prepositioning Ships Squadrons 1 and 2 had equipment readiness ratings of 98 percent and 99 percent respectively. After combat operations much equipment was worn and broken, and the assessment of that equipment is ongoing. In 2003, we had approximately 2,000 Marines in Iraq working to inspect, and where feasible, repair equipment in order to bring it back up to an operational capability. The equipment for back load is operationally capable, i.e., able to shoot, move, and communicate. The equipment used to support the reconstitution of the Maritime Prepositioning Force losses was pulled from assets left behind in the Continental United States (CONUS) by deploying units, Norway Air-Landed Marine Expeditionary Brigade (NALMEB) assets, and from global war reserve stocks. It will take time to return the Maritime Prepositioning Force program to pre-Operation Iraqi Freedom employment capability, and the use of Maritime Prepositioning Squadron assets in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom II may extend reconstitution. One squadron is essentially complete and ready to respond to any contingency. Several ships in the other two squadrons had completed reconstitution, but those ships have since been used to support the Marine forces deploying for Operation Iraqi Freedom II. The current schedule has one Maritime Prepositioning Squadron completing its scheduled maintenance cycle in April 2005, and the second squadron concluding its scheduled maintenance cycle in April 2006. The time it will take until we have all three squadrons back up will be a function of additional equipment requirements in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom II, Corps-wide equipment readiness, and the condition of the equipment that returns from Operation Iraqi Freedom II. In any case, reconstitution of our forces and Maritime Prepositioning Squadrons will be a challenge for at least a couple more years.
We have used assets from the NALMEB Prepositioning Program in the reconstitution of our Maritime Prepositioning Ships Squadrons, and expect to tap further into the assets stored there as we progress in the overall Maritime Prepositioning Force reconstitution as well as in support of Operation IRAQI FREEDOM II. Norway continues to demonstrate its role as a critical and valuable ally to the U.S. through their tremendous support regarding use of our geographically prepositioned assets in their nation. Specifically, their forces have affected several equipment draws, provided local security and in-country transportation for those assets, and executed the loading of that equipment onto MSC shipping in support of our overall Operation IRAQI Freedom requirements.
Depot Maintenance. Returning our operating and Maritime Prepositioning Force equipment to full mission capabilities is one of our highest priorities, and that priority is reflected in the Fiscal Year 2004 Supplemental requests for depot maintenance funding. However, we have constrained our request for equipment throughput at our two Marine Corps depots in order to preclude a significant investment in new facilities or production line tooling.
The single greatest constraint on the ability of the Marine Corps to execute depot maintenance funds in the near term (1-2 years) is asset availability. Asset availability describes the ability to initiate the maintenance process by designating a particular asset as available for induction and the transportation of that asset to a depot maintenance activity.
Marine Corps ground equipment assets are found in one of two primary locations' with the operating forces, or in a preposition location (afloat or ashore). The current operational tempo and our requirement to rapidly reconstitute the Maritime Prepositioning Force make the scheduling of assets for depot maintenance problematic. The Marine Corps chose to strike a balance between the need to have a Maritime Prepositioning Ship and its associated equipment available to the Combatant Commander and the need to conduct depot level maintenance. This balance is reflected in the planning of Maritime Prepositioning Ship Maintenance Cycle (MMC) 8. MMC 8 began in early 2004. It is a 36-month cycle that will systematically rotate the fleet of Maritime Prepositioning Ships through the Blount Island facility to accomplish the necessary maintenance activities (including depot maintenance), which may have been deferred.
We will continue
to evaluate options to
accelerate our depot maintenance
throughput in order to return
mission essential equipment to the operating forces as expeditiously as
possible.
Infrastructure
Marine Corps
bases, facilities, training
areas, ranges, laboratories,
buildings, and Navy hospitals
provide the essential framework
for ensuring our force readiness
at home and overseas. Marine
Corps Infrastructure consists of
15 major bases and stations in
the United States and Japan. We
continue to implement programs
that maintain and improve our
infrastructure while using only
those resources that are
absolutely necessary to
accomplishing our goals. The
Marine Corps' Long-range
Infrastructure Vision,
Installations 2020 (I2020),
provides a roadmap for the
future of this critical support
element of our warfighting
capability. One of the subjects
that I2020 deals with is
Encroachment Control.
Encroachment Control. The Marine Corps strives to be a good steward of the resources entrusted to it. We are grateful to the Congress for providing a tool to manage incompatible developments in close proximity of military-use lands. Monitoring, evaluating, and responding to encroachment is critical to ensuring bases and ranges are available to support mission readiness now and into the future. Many Marine Corps installations were constructed 60 or more years ago in then-rural areas. Some of these areas are now urban in nature due to regional development. The result is encroachment and readiness challenges for the Marine Corps. We are working with federal, state, and local governments, to provide "win-win" solutions to encroachment pressures to ensure compatible land use which will not degrade mission readiness. Several potential partnership acquisitions are in the conceptual phase at four installations: Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort, Marine Corps Mountain Warfare Training Center Bridgeport, and Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton. Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort, and Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton have established conservation forums as a framework to address military requirements, and to collaborate with federal, state, local, and private entities in the region to achieve mutual goals and objectives in compatible land use plans. Other installations are also considering the need to establish conservation forums, such as Marine Corps Base Hawaii, Marine Corps Air station Yuma, Marine Corps Air Ground Task Force Training Center Twenty-nine Palms, and Marine Corps Base Quantico. In addition, an encroachment mitigation plan will be developed to monitor and contain internal and external development threats to Blount Island's long-term mission capability. These initiatives provide the opportunity to develop a long-term vision for our installations for maintaining training readiness.
Urban
encroachment and environmental
issues impact our ability to
maintain an acceptable level of
access to valuable training
areas, and test ranges. Access
restrictions have affected
testing and the training of our
forces, sacrificing rigor and
realism. This trend has
stabilized as a result of the
previous two years legislative
efforts. The Marine Corps
supports the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act
and the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
provisions that seek to codify
prevailing regulatory policies
and practices of EPA and the
states regarding munitions on
operational ranges; and protect
us from negative judicial
decisions that could drastically
undermine readiness.
Blount Island Facility.
The Marine Corps will
complete the acquisition of the
Blount Island facility in
Jacksonville, Florida, in 2004.
Upon ownership transfer to the
Marine Corps, Blount Island
Command becomes responsible for
the stewardship of the land,
buildings, and environment. To
ensure a smooth transition,
efforts are in progress to
establish facility management
processes for base operating
support and services, capital
improvements, facilities
sustainment and restoration, and
anti-terrorism force protection.
The acquisition of the Blount
Island facility in Jacksonville,
Florida, is critical to our
Nation and to our Corps'
warfighting capabilities.
Blount Island's peacetime
mission is to support the
Maritime Prepositioning Force.
Its wartime capability to
support massive logistics
sustainment from the continental
United States gives it strategic
significance.
The
Blount Island facility has a
vital role in the National
Military Strategy as the site
for maintenance operations of
the Maritime
Prepositioning Force.
The Marine Corps thanks Congress
for your role in supporting this
acquisition project.
Safety
Safety programs
are vital to force protection
and operational readiness.
Marine leaders understand the
importance of leadership,
persistence, and accountability
in the effort to reduce mishaps
and accidents. The Fiscal Year
2003 off duty and operational
mishap rates were driven upward
by the mishaps that occurred
during and post Operation Iraqi
Freedom, while the aviation
mishap rate decreased.
To
meet
the Secretary of Defense's
challenge to all Services to
reduce mishaps by 50 percent in
two years, the Marine Corps is
focusing on initiatives that
deal particularly with the
development of strategies and
specific interventions to
preclude mishaps. The Marine
Corps is an active participant
of the Defense Safety Oversight
Committee. Our
leadership at every level
understands the challenge, and
we are actively involved in the
effort to safeguard our most
precious assets - Marines
and Sailors.
Operational Readiness Outlook -
Near Term
We are preparing our Marines and equipment for continued operations in Iraq. We are hardening about 3,000 vehicles, including both large vehicles and the smaller HMMWV's, against small arms, fragmentation, and Improvised Explosive Devices. We have enough body armor for every single Marine, not only in Iraq, but also in Afghanistan, to have sufficient protection. Working with the Army, we are developing technical means to detect and defeat Improvised Explosive Devices. In our operation Iraqi Freedom II pre-deployment training, we have sent our maneuver battalions through an extensive one-week course in southern California. All of our aircrew went through a two-week course in Yuma, Arizona, geared toward tactics and survivability in the current operating environment in Iraq, including convoy escort and Man-Portable (MANPAD) surface-to-air missile countermeasures and avoidance training. Each of our aircraft deploying for Operation Iraqi Freedom are undergoing modification to install the most modern Aircraft Survivability Equipment (ASE) to mitigate their susceptibility to the MANPAD threat. All deploying combat support and combat service support Marines have completed an extensive combat training course, ensuring that we adhere to our fundamental tenet, "Every Marine a rifleman."
Your Marines deploying for operation Iraqi Freedom II will deploy in two rotations of seven months each. This rotation policy will result in the least disruption to the long-term health of the Marine Corps. We believe that this rotation policy is our best course to minimize stop-loss/stop-move orders, interruptions in recruit training, ensure career progression and development, professional military education, and to allow flexible force applications for other deployment requirements. The first force rotation, from March until September 2004, will be composed of approximately 25,000 combat-equipped Marines, including almost 3,000-reserve component Marines. A second force rotation, from September 2004 to March 2005, of like size and composition, will overlap the first and ensure a smooth and stable transition.
Our single
greatest concern as we look
beyond Operation Iraqi Freedom
II is setting the force for
subsequent training and
operations. When we refer to
setting the force, we are
addressing our ongoing efforts
to maintain the combat readiness
of your Marine Corps. In our
preparation for current global
operations, Optempo, Perstempo
and the maintenance, repair, or
replacement of equipment are our
focus; but as we set the force,
we also have modernization and
transformation in mind.
Modernization and
Transformation
Achieving our vision for the future of the Marine Corps while maintaining near-term readiness will require the upgrade and modernization of current systems until they can be replaced, while we carry out key modernization and transformational programs. Our top acquisition priorities, such as the MV-22 Osprey, the KC-130J, the Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle, the Short Take Off Vertical Landing Joint Strike Fighter, the Lightweight-155 mm Howitzer, the High Mobility Artillery Rocket System, and the CH-53X and UH-1Y/AH-1Z are the cornerstone of the Marine Corps future capabilities. Initiatives like the family of Navy and Marine Corps Mine Countermeasures systems, concepts such as Tactical Air Integration, Logistics Modernization and Command and Control, and improvements in Intelligence and Information Operations are equally essential to our transformation effort, and we are exploring technology and processes that facilitate our transformation.
Most important of all to our future readiness are our Sea Power 21 initiatives in partnership with the Navy. We hold a deep and abiding conviction that Sea Basing initiatives hold the greatest promise for transforming your Marine Corps-Navy team into a more ready, flexible, and responsive force - able to project sustainable power across the full spectrum of operational capabilities anywhere in the world. More than just an alternative to current capabilities, operations conducted from a sea base may well become the preferred method for national crisis response in the 21st century. Naval forces will be strategically and operationally agile, projecting power from a fully networked sea base while operating within the security derived from the Navy's command of the sea. Sea Basing will provide national decision makers with unprecedented versatility, because naval forces can exploit the freedom of the high seas as maneuver space, relatively unconstrained by political, geographic, or diplomatic restrictions. Navy and Marine Corps warfighting capabilities, thoroughly integrated across all sea-based systems and assets, will provide our Nation and Regional Combatant Commanders the combat ready forces necessary to fight and win in the conflicts of the 21st century.
Several new ship
classes are coming on line
within the next few years that
are important to the readiness
of The Navy and Marine Corps
Team. The operational
capability and flexibility of
the naval expeditionary fleet
will be significantly enhanced
with the Fiscal Year 2005
delivery of USS San Antonio, the
first of 12 new landing assault
ships with advanced
characteristics for amphibious
warships. LHA(R) concept
designs are being evaluated
within the context of Joint Sea
Basing and power projection.
This ship will be the
centerpiece of the Expeditionary
Strike Group, a contributor to
the Expeditionary Strike Force,
and will carry expeditionary
warfare through the middle of
this century. LHA(R) will
greatly enhance command and
control capabilities and at sea
training for embarked forces.
The resulting design is planned
to provide a transformational
capability that is interoperable
with future amphibious and
Maritime Preposition Force
ships, high-speed vessels, and
advanced rotorcraft like the
MV-22 and CH-53X, and the Joint
Strike Fighter. The Littoral
Combat Ship will be a networked,
agile, mission focused, stealthy
surface combatant with
capabilities optimized for
responsiveness to threats in the
littorals.
This year, the Marine Corps
continues to refine plans for
the Marine Expeditionary Brigade
of 2015, in concert with our
concept for sea-based
operations. Similarly, the
Analysis of Alternatives for our
Maritime Prepositioning Force
(Future), a critical component
of Sea Basing, will provide
valid choices for achieving Sea
Basing capabilities. These
initiatives will complement,
rather than replace, the
amphibious lift and forcible
entry capacity of the LHA(R),
LPD-17, and LHD, and will
provide the Nation a deployment
and employment capability
unmatched in the modern world.
Conclusion
In conclusion, I would like to again thank the members of the Committee for their continuing support of the Marine Corps, and for the opportunity to discuss our readiness issues. The young men and women of your Corps are doing an exceptional job in Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom. Their accomplishments are a direct reflection of your continued support and commitment to maintaining our Nation's expeditionary warfighting capability. We go forward with confidence because Marines have the best training and equipment in the world, thanks to the support of this Committee, and the Nation we proudly serve.
2120 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515
NEWSLETTER
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|