UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Military


US House Armed Services Committee
US House Armed Services Committee
Press Release
For Immediate Release:
March 31, 2004

Contact:

Harald Stavenas
Angela Sowa
(202) 225-2539
Jeff Sagnip (Saxton)
(609) 261-5801

Opening Statements of Chairman Jim Saxton
Hearing on "Department of Defense Business Transformation"

Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen. The Subcommittee on Terrorism, Unconventional Threats and Capabilities meets this afternoon to learn more about how the Department of Defense is modernizing its business processes and practices. Essentially, how are DOD Business modernization efforts progressing?

The Department's information technology (IT) request for fiscal year 2005 is $28.7 billion and is intended to support both on-going operating requirements and programs in development. The subcommittee is mindful that while these funds may support many important IT systems, the Department continues to spend money to update legacy systems that the new systems will soon replace. It is the subcommittee's concern that these dollars are not being applied to business and warfighting programs, especially when our soldiers, sailors, Marines, airmen, and pilots are conducting military operations around the globe.

As one of the world's largest and most intricate organizations, no one doubts that running day-to-day business operations at the Department is challenging. With over $1 trillion in assets, nearly $1.6 trillion in liabilities, over 3.3 million military and civilian personnel, and disbursements of over $416 billion in fiscal year 2003, it is critical that the Department exercise effective management over its business operations. That is why we are here today. We are interested to learn what DOD is doing to bring its numerous financial management and business information technology systems into streamlined processes.

Many major commercial businesses have undergone significant business transformations in the past decade in order to stay profitable. Using the industry model, DOD would be wise to leverage such commercial best practices to improve its own business practices. Implementing an enterprise architecture, using performance metrics to measure new system developments, and breaking cultural barriers and parochial interests are a few examples of such practices.

The subcommittee remains committed to ensuring that resources are properly allocated to IT systems that fit into a department-wide enterprise architecture. However, we remain concerned that the Department's business system implementers are ignoring the law and the Department's leadership by continuing to develop stovepipe systems that do not conform to a DOD enterprise architecture. It appears there is wide spread disregard for the law that requires procurement officials to obtain the Comptroller's permission before purchasing IT equipment and services costing more than $1 million. Some IT and acquisition officials apparently believe it is easier to ask for forgiveness than to abide by the law and ask for permission first. These and other fundamental issues must be addressed as the Department handles day-to-day business functions to support military operations around the world.

###


House Armed Services Committee
2120 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list