Statement of
Chairman Curt Weldon
Hearing on Tactical Aircraft and Supporting
Programs
This morning the Tactical Air
and Land Forces Subcommittee meets to receive
testimony on tactical aircraft and related
programs in the Fiscal Year 2005 budget
request.
We have two
panels of witnesses: The first representing
the General Accounting Office to provide the
Subcommittee with their views on the status of
the F/A-22 and Joint Strike Fighter programs
and the second, representatives of the
Departments of the Navy and Air Force to
provide us an update on the F/A-22 and JSF and
other major tactical aircraft and related
programs.
I've maintained
through the years, first as Chairman of the
R&D Subcommittee, again as Chairman of the
Military Procurement Subcommittee, and now
today that the proposed defense budgets were
insufficient to adequately fund the programs
included in the budget requests. This is
particularly true for the tactical aircraft
programs -- to include the Comanche helicopter
program. Unfortunately, this is exactly what
has and is happening.
Comanche has
been cancelled. The F/A-22 cost increases
continue to result in a reduction in aircraft,
with the total buy now projected at 218
aircraft. Last year the Navy reduced its
projected buy of Joint Strike Fighters by over
400 aircraft -- and the first flight of the
Navy JSF is well over 3 years away. Looking at
the long-term and the overall DOD budget, CBO
projects an approximate 30 percent shortfall
in required funding to execute the long term
defense plan. Given the overall national
fiscal realities, this portends further
program adjustments.
The F/A-22
program began in 1986 with a plan for 750
aircraft. With the subsequent reductions
related to the end of the Cold War and much
smaller defense budgets, the Air Force had a
procurement objective in 1998 of 381 aircraft.
Since that point in time, with continued
program cost increases and with the
congressionally imposed cap on the production
program, the Department of Defense and the GAO
agree that the likely buy under the
congressionally imposed procurement cost cap
is approximately 218 aircraft. The good news
is that progress has been made in the last
year with the F/A-22, with apparent resolution
of the vertical tail buffet problem and
improved avionics software reliability.
Both the F/A-22
and Joint Strike Fighter are very complex
systems and offer to provide our military
services with superior capability. But both of
these programs are costly to the American
taxpayer and we must do everything we can to
contain those costs.
The F/A 22 R&D
and procurement costs have increased well over
100 percent. The R&D estimated cost of the
Joint Strike Fighter, is already up 80
percent. In just the last year alone, the JSF
R&D program has gone up 22 percent.
I appreciate
the technical challenges in these programs.
But when we have senior DOD representatives
testify before us as to the importance of
accurate costing to the credibility and
integrity of the acquisition system, tell us
that all of the major programs have been re-baselined
for cost, and then we continue to incur double
digit cost increases on an annual basis on
many of our major programs, credibility does
indeed suffer. If we are to make informed
judgments on programs, we have to do a better
job at estimating program costs.
Another area of
concern is in the electronic combat mission
area. DOD plans project going from one major
platform, the EA-6, to at least four: the
EA-18, the B-52, miniature air launched
decoys, and a JSF derivative. The Joint
Unmanned Combat Air System, formerly the
Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle, is a fifth
platform mentioned for the electronic combat
role. Unfortunately, it now appears that this
program has been orphaned by the Air Force and
Navy and is a $700 million program in the
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.
Without service funding, we may be missing an
opportunity to address a variety of strike and
electronic combat requirements with what would
be a truly transformational capability.
###
House
Armed Services Committee
2120 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515