UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Military


US House Armed Services Committee

STATEMENT BY
GENERAL JOHN M. KEANE
VICE CHIEF OF STAFF
UNITED STATES ARMY

BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON READINESS
HOUSE ARMED SERVICE COMMITTEE
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 18, 2003

 


Mr. Chairman and members of the committee, thank you for the opportunity to testify before you on the current and future readiness of the United States Army.  On behalf of every Soldier, civilian, and Army family member I would first like to thank this committee, and the Congress as a whole, for your support of the fiscal year 2003 budget. 

With your help the Army received a 4.1 percent average pay increase for our soldiers and increased housing allowances to reduce out-of-pocket expenses from 11.3 percent to 7.5 percent.  The fiscal year 2003 budget also funds significant Army initiatives to retain and recruit quality Soldiers, provides for upgraded single-soldier barracks, and expands many programs that improve the quality of life for our Soldiers and their families.

We also appreciate your continued support of our Army's Transformation goals.  The 2003 budget fully funds our third Stryker Brigade Combat Team (SBCT), provides an additional $105 million for the Army's Future Combat System (FCS), $173 million for the development of FCS Non-Line of Sight Cannon, and also funds $874 million for the Comanche helicopter system.

Across the board, the fiscal year 2003 budget sends a strong message of Congressional support for our soldiers, civilians, and families - and clearly indicates your resolve to help sustain the readiness of our Army as we Transform for the future.

THE ARMY AT WAR

Today our Army is engaged throughout the world - fighting the Global War on Terrorism, providing peace and stability to regions throughout the world, and preparing for a potential war in Iraq.  Our simultaneous commitment to these operations, and the successes we have achieved, clearly indicate our military capability and state of readiness. 

In the weeks immediately following the attacks of September 11, Special Operations Forces skillfully infiltrated Afghanistan and leveraged the capabilities of long-range Joint fires to enable the Northern Alliance to rapidly defeat the Taliban.  At home, our Active and Reserve Component Soldiers quickly moved to secure our airports, waterways, harbors, nuclear plants, dams, power generation facilities, and other critical infrastructure throughout the United States.  By January 2002, U.S. and allied conventional forces joined our Special Operations Forces and demonstrated courage and resolve under the most challenging conditions.  During the 12 days of Operation Anaconda, our Soldiers often fought outnumbered against a tough, determined enemy and proved once again that they are the best-trained Soldiers in the world. 

Without question, the Army is trained and ready to defend the American people - to fight when required.  At the same time, we remain committed to numerous smaller scale contingencies - providing peace and stability to regions throughout the world that would otherwise be in chaos and unable to support viable economies. 

The success of these operations, and our Soldiers' performance throughout the war, present the best evidence I can offer on the Army's readiness to fulfill its non-negotiable contract with America - to fight and win the Nation's wars.  With the support of Congress and the Administration, the Army will continue to fulfill its role in the war on terrorism, maintain our near-term readiness, and rapidly transform to fight and win our future conflicts.

 

TRAINING

More than anything else, our standing as the greatest Army in the world is due to our Soldiers' skill - it is our training that makes the difference.  This state of readiness, however, does not just happen.  It requires realistic, multi-echelon training under battlefield-like conditions to meld soldiers and equipment into the best fighting force in the world.  The recent performance of our Soldiers reinforces the Army's position that assuming risk in Operating Tempo (OPTEMPO) is unacceptable.  Therefore, OPTEMPO is again a top priority that is reflected in the fiscal year 2004 budget.

OPTEMPO

The fiscal year 2004 budget fully supports a ground OPTEMPO program of 913 M1 Abrams tank miles (live and virtual).  The flying hour program provides 13.1 flight hours per aircrew per month, which represents our best historical rate of execution.  We have funded 25 brigade rotations through our Combat Training Centers to provide commanders with the resources they need to execute tough, demanding, combined-arms training that will keep their forces trained and ready.  The Battle Command Training Program will conduct three Corps Warfighter exercises and train seven division command and staff groups.

ENVIRONMENTAL ENCROACHMENT - EFFECT ON READINESS

Maneuver land and live-fire ranges are an essential element of our training process - without them, our Soldiers cannot develop and maintain the confidence and skill they demonstrate today.  We must retain those resources that allow our forces to maintain the level of readiness the American people have come to expect, and deserve.

The Fiscal Year 2004 Defense Department Readiness and Range Preservation Initiative (RRPI) proposals address several of the Army's concerns regarding environmental encroachment to include training restrictions that stem from the management of threatened and endangered species and the expanded application of environmental regulations to the use of military munitions.  The proposed RRPI provisions do not seek to eliminate our responsibility to protect the natural resources under our care.  Rather, they seek to clarify and affirm existing policies and ensure that military ranges - set aside to allow live-fire and maneuver training and contain potential impacts - remain available to train Soldiers for combat. 

The Army is committed to its responsibility as an environmental steward for the 16.5 million acres in our care.  However, we are equally committed to another precious resource that America entrusts to us - her sons and daughters.  We are obligated to provide our soldiers with the most realistic training scenarios possible to prepare them for the rigors of war.  The Army will never abandon its environmental responsibilities, but we must have land on which to train.

Unless we can resolve several issues at our key training areas, we face the very real possibility that we will lose some of our critical training areas or, at a minimum, we will be forced to deny our soldiers the opportunity to participate in the number and type of exercises required to learn and retain perishable skills.  Your support of this legislation will help provide the flexibility needed to conduct realistic training and protect the land and resources America entrusts to us.

NATIONAL SECURITY EXEMPTIONS

The existence of National Security Exemptions is frequently used as an argument against the legislative clarifications proposed in DoD's RRPI initiative.  Although some environmental statutes do allow for national security exemptions, they were never intended as a permanent solution to recurring requirements.  Such exemptions are generally reserved for approval at the Presidential level, apply only to very specific activities at individual sites, and remain in effect for only one year.  The readiness activities we are concerned with are not "one-time" events.  They are part of the day-to-day training regimen of our soldiers and it is simply unrealistic to expect the military to request exemptions for training that must occur on a regular basis.  Rather, we should resolve the basic issue through the clarification of Congress' original legislative intent.

STRATEGIC READINESS REPORTING

The Army's Strategic Readiness System was implemented in October 2002 as a comprehensive strategic management and readiness assessment tool.  It provides Army leadership with accurate, objective, predictive, and actionable readiness information to dramatically enhance strategic resource management.  For the first time we have an Army enterprise management system that integrates readiness information from both the Active and Reserve Components - enabling the Army to improve support to Combatant Commanders, invest in Soldiers and their families, identify and adopt sound business practices, and Transform the Army to the Objective Force.  This reporting system markedly improves how we measure readiness by gathering timely information with precision and expands the scope of the data considered.  We are further developing this system to leverage leading indicators and predict trends - avoiding issues that affect readiness before they become problems.

PEOPLE READINESS

Army readiness is directly linked to our ability to recruit and retain quality Soldiers.  Therefore, we are committed to those efforts that improve our Soldiers' quality of life and provide for a suitable standard of living.  The fiscal year 2004 budget funds an average pay raise of 4.1 percent and provides for targeted pay increases for specific grades and years of service.  The budget also provides $300 million to increase housing allowances and reduces Soldiers' out-of-pocket expenses to 3.5 percent.  This level of funding puts the Army on track for eliminating average out-of-pocket costs entirely by fiscal year 2005 for those Soldiers and families living on the economy.  With these increases in pay and benefits, the Army is renewing its commitment to our Soldiers and their families and providing a stimulus to retain the expertise that is fundamental to our readiness.

RECRUITING AND RETENTION

In 1999, the Army missed its recruiting goals by approximately 6,300 inductees in the Active Component and by some 10,000 in the Reserve Component.  In fiscal year 2002, all three components of the Army achieved their overall mission for the third consecutive year.  The Active Component exceeded its 79,500 enlisted accession target and is poised to make the fiscal year 2003 accession target of 73,800.  The Army also exceeded its aggregate fiscal year 2002 retention objective of 56,800 Soldiers in all three categories. 

The Army Reserve's recruiting force is well structured to meet fiscal year 2004 challenges and continues to maintain a strong Selected Reserve strength posture at 205,484 (as of January 17, 2003) - over 100 percent of the fiscal year 2003 end strength objective.  Overcoming many recruiting and retention challenges in fiscal year 2002, the Army National Guard exceeded its end strength mission and reenlistment objectives. 

MANNING

In fiscal year 2000, we implemented a strategy to man units at 100 percent of authorized strength.  Starting with divisional combat units, the program expanded in fiscal year 2001 and fiscal year 2002 to include early deploying units.  In fiscal year 2002, we maintained our manning goals and continued to fill our Divisions, Armored Cavalry Regiments, and selected Early Deploying Units to 100 percent in the aggregate, with a 93 to 95 percent skill and grade-band match.  We remain on a glide path to accomplish our long-term goal of filling all Army warfighting units to 100 percent of authorized strength.

QUALITY OF LIFE

The Army established the Barracks Upgrade Program in the late 1990's to improve single Soldiers' housing conditions.  Through 2002, we have upgraded, or funded-for-upgrade, 70 percent of our permanent party barracks to Soldier-Suites that consist of two single bedrooms with a shared bath and common area.  The Army will continue the upgrade program until all permanent party barracks achieve this standard - we remain firmly committed to completing the Barracks Upgrade Program by 2010.

For our families, the Army - with the strong support of Congress - established the Residential Communities Initiative.  This program leverages commercial expertise and private capital to perform a non-core function for the Army - family-housing management.  The program provides greater value to the Army by attracting more than $700 million in private capital to alleviate housing shortages and improve the condition of our existing housing more rapidly than government resources would otherwise allow.  The Army's privatization program began with four pilot projects and will expand to 18 active projects by the end of fiscal year 2003.  Pending Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) and Congressional approval, 28 projects are planned for the end of fiscal year 2006.  By the end of 2007, we will have the programs and projects in place to meet the OSD goal of eliminating inadequate family housing.  We will accomplish this goal through RCI and increased Army investment in family housing Military Constructions at non-privatized installations

INSTALLATION READINESS

Army installations are our Nation's power projection platforms and they provide critical training support to the Army and other members of the Joint team.  Installations also provide our Soldiers, families, and civilians a place to live and work.  Therefore, the quality of our infrastructure directly affects the readiness of the Army. 

The Army has traditionally accepted substantial risk in infrastructure to maintain its current warfighting readiness.  However, a decade of chronic under funding has left over 50 percent of our facilities and infrastructure in such poor condition that commanders rated them as "adversely affecting mission requirements."  Over the past two years, with the help of the Administration and Congress, the Army began to rectify this situation with significant increases in funding and innovative business practices.  These efforts have been dramatically successful as we continue to correct a problem that was a decade in the making.  In a continuing effort to prevent future degradation of our facilities, the Army will fund facilities sustainment at 93 percent of the requirement in fiscal year 2004.

TRANSFORMATION OF INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT

In a significant paradigm shift from the way the Army historically managed its installations, the Secretary of the Army directed the reorganization of the Army's installation management structure.  On October 1, 2002, the Army began to place its installations under the Installation Management Agency (IMA).  IMA is a field-operating agency of the Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Management.  The intent is to streamline headquarters and resources, create more agile and responsive staffs, reduce layers of review and approval, and allow mission commanders to focus on their core warfighting tasks.  IMA will provide equitable, efficient, and effective management of Army installations worldwide to support readiness, improve infrastructure, and preserve the environment.  This new management approach eliminates the migration of Base Operations funds to other operational accounts below the Headquarters Department of the Army level.  It also enables the development of multi-functional installations to support evolving force structure and Army Transformation needs. 

EQUIPMENT READINESS - RECAPITALIZATION & MODERNIZATION

Recapitalization is the cornerstone of the Army's strategy to sustain its warfighting capability throughout the fielding of the Objective Force.  Therefore, we are committed to the recapitalization of two divisions in the Counter Attack Corps and Army Aviation modernization and restructuring.  Our strategy is to selectively rebuild or upgrade systems that will remain in the inventory for the next 15 to 20 years and achieve an average fleet age of no more than half of a system's expected service life.  These systems include the M1 Abrams tank, M2/M3 Bradley Fighting Vehicle, AH-64 Apache, UH-60 Black Hawk, and CH-47 Chinook.  If sufficiently resourced, this investment in future readiness will sustain warfighting capabilities, reduce the cost of ownership, and extend the service life of systems until the Objective Force is fielded throughout the Army.

The Army's aviation modernization plan now in progress, will eliminate Vietnam-era aircraft from the force by 2004, lower operating and sustainment costs, and posture Army aviation for the arrival of the Objective Force.  By fiscal year 2007, we will achieve a 23 percent reduction in our helicopter inventory (from 4,533 aircraft in fiscal year 2001 to 3,491 aircraft in fiscal year 2007).

Apache modernization is an integral part of the Army Aviation Transformation Plan.  The AH-64D Longbow will enhance domination of the maneuver battlespace and provide the ground commander with a versatile, long-range weapon system against a range of fixed and moving targets.  The UH-60 Black Hawk continues to be the assault workhorse of Army Aviation, executing over 40 percent of the Army's annual flying hours.  We are extending the life of the UH-60 while providing it with capabilities required by the future battlespace.  Similarly, the Army is fully committed to the CH-47F Chinook program.  Its heavy-lift capability is invaluable to transforming the Army.  As we restructure and standardize attack and lift formations across the force, we will also adjust the stationing and alignment of Reserve Component aviation units to mitigate the near-term risk.

ARMY TRANSFORMATION IS OUR FUTURE READINESS

The strategic environment has changed and the Army must change with it.  We must Transform to a more strategically responsive force that is dominant across the full spectrum of military operations.  Fundamentally, we must change the way the Army fights and the way it deploys.  With changes to doctrine, training, leader development, organization, materiel acquisition strategies, and soldier systems, the Army is taking a holistic approach to its Transformation.  The result will be a different Army, not just a modernized version of the current Army.

Built around the FCS, the Army's Objective Force is the future Joint, Interagency, and Multi-national precision maneuver instrument for this Nation.  Comprised of modular, scalable, flexible organizations for prompt and sustained land operations, it will be more lethal, more agile, and more rapidly deployable.  In May of this year, we are confident that FCS Milestone B will transition the FCS program from Concept and Technology Development into Systems Development and Demonstration.  The Army will begin fielding the Objective Force in this decade with the first FCS combat maneuver force equipped in 2008 - Initial Operating Capability (IOC) for this unit is expected in 2010.

Stryker Brigade Combat Teams bridge a capabilities gap between our lethal, survivable, but slow-to-deploy heavy forces and our rapidly deployable light forces that lack the protection, lethality, and tactical mobility that we seek.  In the spring of 2003, we will achieve IOC with the first SBCT at Fort Lewis, Washington.  IOC for the remaining five SBCTs will occur each year thereafter through 2008.  The Army has resourced six SBCTs in concert with the 1-4-2-1 defense construct and national security requirements.  However, at this time, the Secretary of Defense has only authorized the procurement of the first four brigades pending the Army's plan for potential modifications to Stryker Brigades five and six.  We intend to work with the Secretary of Defense and this Congress to assure that all six Stryker Brigades are fielded with the force structure and capabilities they need to possess.

CONCLUSION

For nearly 228 years, the Army has kept its covenant with the American people to fight and win our Nation's wars.  In all that time, we have never failed them and we never will.  Building and maintaining an Army is a shared responsibility between the Congress, the Administration, those of us in uniform, and the American people.  With the help of Congress and the Administration, we will keep the Army ready to meet today's challenges and continue to make significant strides toward achieving the vision of a Transformed Army in this decade.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman and distinguished members of the committee for allowing me to appear before you today.  I look forward to discussing these issues with you.   

House Armed Services Committee
2120 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list