UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Military

 DOT&E Director, Operational Test & Evaluation  
FY98 Annual Report
FY98 Annual Report

EA-6B UPGRADES


NAVY ACAT III Program:

ICAP III: Prime Contractor
Total Number of Systems:125Northrup Grumman/Litton
Total Program Cost (TY$):$ 1.162B 
Average Unit Cost (TY$):$ 9.3MService Certified Y2K Compliant
Full-rate production:3QFY03No
BAND 9/10 TRANSMITTER: Prime Contractor
Total Number of Systems:196TRACOR Aerospace Electronic Systems
Total Program Cost (TY$):$85.2M 
Average Unit Cost (TY$):$503KService Certified Y2K Compliant
Full-rate production:1QFY97Yes
BLOCK 89A: Prime Contractor
Total Number of Systems:125Government
Total Program Cost (TY$):$403 Major Subcontractor: Northrup Grumman
Average Unit Cost (TY$):
BLK 82 (72 kits)
BLK 89 (49 kits)

$4.303M
$1.842M
Service Certified Y2K Compliant
Yes
Full-rate production:4QFY04 
LOW BAND TRANSMITTER: Prime Contractor
Total Number of Systems:210Tracor Aerospace
Total Program Cost (TY$):$101.1M 
Average Unit Cost (TY$):$434KService Certified Y2K Compliant
Full-rate production:1QFY00No
USQ-113 COMMUNICATIONS JAMMER: Prime Contractor Lockheed Martin (Sanders)
Total Number of Systems:63 
Total Program Cost (TY$):$21M 
Average Unit Cost (TY$):$333KService Certified Y2K Compliant
Full-rate production:FY96Yes

SYSTEM DESCRIPTION & CONTRIBUTION TO JOINT VISION 2010

The EA-6B "Prowler" aircraft contributes to the Joint Vision 2010 concept of full-dimensional protection by improving supported aircraft probability of survival through its contribution to the Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses (SEAD) Electronic Attack (EA) mission.

The EA-6B is a four-seat, all weather, twin turbojet powered, tactical EA aircraft designed to operate from aircraft carriers and airfields ashore. Its primary mission is the interception, analysis, identification, and jamming of enemy weapons control and communications systems in support of joint offensive and defensive operations. High priority EA missions include SEAD by denying, delaying, or degrading the enemy's ability to detect and target friendly forces. The crew includes one pilot and three electronic countermeasures officers. The EA-6B carries the AN/ALQ-99 Tactical Jamming System (TJS). The TJS on-board system (OBS) includes the receiver, processor, and aircrew interfaces. The TJS also includes a selection of mission configured jammer pods carried as external stores. Each jammer pod contains a ram air turbine generator, two selectable transmitter modules with associated antennas, and a universal exciter that is interfaced with and controlled by the OBS and aircrew. The modular open architecture of the jammer system, which facilitates optimizing transmitters and antennas for a given frequency range, also facilitates tailored mission configurations. The EA-6B also has the USQ-113 Communications Jammer and is armed with high-speed anti-radiation missiles (HARM).


BACKGROUND INFORMATION

The EA-6B has been operational since 1972. It has undergone a number of upgrade programs: Expanded Capability, Improved Capability (ICAP), and Improved Capability II (ICAP II). ICAP II was adjudged operationally effective and suitable and was installed on operational aircraft in Operation Desert Storm. Major upgrades included HARM capability and updated communications.

A major set of upgrades, designated Advanced Capability (ADVCAP) was in Full Scale Development in FY93. These included on-board system upgrades and substantial changes to the aircraft itself. ADVCAP warfighting improvements included a new receiver processor system, the AN/ALQ-149 Communications Jammer, a new band 2/3 transmitter, and an upgrade to the universal exciter. Also included was a major aircraft avionics upgrade and airframe and engine improvements. IOT&E (OT IIA) of the warfighting improvements on ADVCAP was completed in 1QFY94. The ADVCAP program was excluded from the FY95 Navy budget submission and was subsequently canceled.

The current EA-6B upgrade program includes:

  • Sustainment: Funding levels support changing all aircraft to a Block 89A configuration; however, the program office and the OPNAV sponsor are reviewing the configuration mix to optimize inventory. The Block 89A configuration brings all aircraft to a common baseline including structural and safety of flight, computer, navigation system, and communications upgrades.


  • Improvements: Essential warfighting capability improvements include the Universal Exciter Upgrade (UEU), the Band 9/10 transmitter (transferred to the Navy from the canceled EF-111, and the Low Band Transmitter (LBT), all of which are modular upgrades for use with the AN/ALQ-99 jamming pods. In addition, there is an ongoing USQ-113/Connectivity Upgrade program that provides aircrew with improved situational awareness and the ability to receive and jam communications signals. Situational reception is via a Multi-Mission Advanced Tactical Terminal and the Integrated Data Modem. Until the ICAP III program is fielded, a laptop computer that does not interface with on-board systems will control the situational awareness and Communications Receiver/Jammer capabilities.


  • ICAP III: Develops and procures a new tactical receiver that enhances the reactive jamming capability of the EA6-B to replace aging, 1960s designed receivers. Additionally, the ICAP III systems integrate the above mentioned situational awareness systems and USQ-113 Communications Receiver/Jammer displays with the aircraft on-board systems. A new Controls and Display Suite replaces an existing system for the two rear cockpit operators and is made available to the pilot and right-front cockpit, allowing improved crew operations of the aircraft. Provisions for Link-16, via the Multi-Functional Information Distribution System are included. The current plan is to transition all EA6-B aircraft to the ICAP III configuration by 2010.

The UEU program completed OPEVAL and was found to be operationally effective and suitable. It achieved Milestone (MS) III in 2QFY96, and entered full-rate production in 4QFY96. The Band 9/10 transmitter completed DT in June 1997 and the OPEVAL was conducted between July-August 1997. The independent DOT&E evaluation results of "effective" and "potentially suitable" closely parallel the OPTEVFOR evaluation of the same data. FOT&E are required to evaluate compatibility of a new radome for use with the Band 9/10 transmitter prior to fleet fielding. This radome is intended to resolve the potential for damage of the current radomes by the Band 9/10 XMTR. Band 9/10 XMTR MS III was achieved in 1QFY98.


TEST & EVALUATION ACTIVITY

The draft LBT TEMP was updated during FY98 to reflect Navy staffing to re-baseline the LBT development program for cost and schedule overruns.

DOT&E staff participated with an IPT formed in 1QFY97 to facilitate TEMP preparation in support of source selection and MS II for the ICAP-III upgrades. DOT&E is awaiting submission of the TEMP and the system has entered MS II and EMD. Detailed test planning continues.

DT of the Block-89A upgrades continued in FY98. The Block-89A TEMP was submitted and approved in October 1998, and the OT test plan is undergoing DOT&E review with OPEVAL planned in early FY99. The key focus of this OPEVAL is to ensure that there is no regression in operational effectiveness and suitability due to the replacement mission computer and re-hosted mission software.

Developmental and Operational Testing of the USQ-113/Connectivity integration continued in FY98. The TEMP and OT test plan was submitted for DOT&E approval in 4QFY98 with final FOT&E and IOC planned for early FY99.


TEST & EVALUATION ASSESSMENT

As subsequent components of the current EA-6B Upgrade program enter IOT&E, EA-6B aircraft and avionics systems will be tested as part of the baseline configuration. Sequential FOT&E allows for testing of new capabilities, regression testing, and continued evaluation of the full operational potential of each EA-6B upgrade program beyond their independent MS III decisions. This systematic approach allows incremental improvement to EA-6B war fighting capability, providing a synergistic roadmap for fielding of the ICAP III EA-6B variant. The complexity of upgrading airframe and survivability modifications, safety of flight improvements, jammer upgrades, and system modifications to meet ICAP III baseline requirements have tasked the test community, but to date program performance and test adequacy have been satisfactory.

ICAP III achieved a MS II decision in May 1998. Although a TEMP has not been submitted to date, a formal TEMP is expected in 3QFY99. Initial planning efforts have been comprehensive and demonstrate adequate test planning activity.

The production of new materials to resolve Band 9/10 radome discrepancies has been problematic, but well within the technical abilities of the program office and suppliers. The tactical limitations imposed are relatively minor, but the program office intends on fielding a system without limitations. DOT&E will ensure discrepancies are corrected during FOT&E.


Return to Table of Contents



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list