Intelligence

DATE=10/05/04

TYPE=CORRESPONDENT REPORT

TITLE=CONGRESS/9-11 (L-O)

NUMBER=2-319447

BYLINE=DAN ROBINSON

DATELINE=CAPITOL HILL

CONTENT=

VOICED AT:

HEADLINE: The U.S. House Of Representatives Is To Debate On A New Intelligence Organization

INTRO: The House of Representatives will soon debate major legislation to reorganize the U.S. intelligence system, as the Senate also moves toward a vote on a separate bipartisan intelligence reform bill. VOA's Dan Robinson reports from Capitol Hill, although lawmakers all believe in the objective, Democrats and Republicans continue to passionately defend their methods for achieving it:

TEXT: In the Senate, a bill supported by Democrats and Republicans makes its way to debate and a final vote.

In the House, a bill Republicans crafted largely on their own with little involvement by Democrats, is on a similar course.

In daily tests of will, lawmakers from both parties hold dueling news conferences not so much aimed at persuading the other side, but at persuading Americans.

House (Republican) Speaker Dennis Hastert, who accuses Democrats of using the intelligence reform bill as a political football says the Republican-crafted legislation will make the country safer:

/// HASTERT ACT ///

I believe this is a fair bill that reflects the will of the 9-11 Commission. I believe it reflects the will of Congress to protect the American people. And I believe it reflects the American people's resolve to win the war against terrorists.

/// END ACT ///

As they have all week, House Democrats disagree and accuse Republicans of seeking to push their bill through with a minimum of debate. House Minority leader Nancy Pelosi:

/// PELOSI ACT ///

House Republicans stand alone as the only obstacle in the way of passing a 9-11 bill that will make America safer.

/// END ACT ///

Families of victims in the September 11 (2001) terrorist attacks have appeared on Capitol Hill supporting either the bipartisan Senate bill on intelligence reform, or the one in the House.

Their comments reflect both the political divides in the country in this election year, as well as their own assessments of the recommendations by the 9-11 Commission that investigated the 2001 attacks.

Colette Lafuente, whose husband died in the World Trade Center in New York, made clear where she stands on controversial provisions that would give the government substantial new counter-terrorist powers:

/// LAFUENTE ACT ///

I would say that a bill that does not contain these provisions is nothing other than some kind of show to look like people are doing something when they are not really accomplishing anything at all.

/// END ACT ///

/// OPT /// Peter Gadiel, who lost his son James in the World Trade Center, says the Senate version of intelligence reform legislation, which is supported by other 9-11 families, will lay the groundwork for another terrorist attack:

/// GADIEL ACT ///

They (other 9-11 families) do not oppose these provisions, but they have been in a sense blackmailed by people on the other side who don't want to see these things (tough new laws) see the light of day. What the Senate has proposed is like building a fort and leaving half the walls off.

/// END ACT - END OPT ///

In the Senate, the key sponsors of bipartisan 9-11 legislation say attempts by others to weaken that bill have not succeeded.

One of the main differences between Senate and House legislation involves whether to make public the amount of money the government spends each year on intelligence gathering.

After both the House and Senate approve their respective bills, negotiators from each chamber will have to work out compromise legislation, a process that promises its own difficulties. (signed)

NEB/DAR/PT