OSAMA BIN LADIN AND IRAQ
Iraq News, FEBRUARY 10, 1999
By Laurie MylroieThe central focus of Iraq News is the tension between the considerable, proscribed WMD capabilities that Iraq is holding on to and its increasing stridency that it has complied with UNSCR 687 and it is time to lift sanctions. If you wish to receive Iraq News by email, a service which includes full-text of news reports not archived here, send your request to Laurie Mylroie .
I. OSAMA BIN LADIN AND IRAQ, CORRIERE DELLA SERA, FEB 1
II. OSAMA BIN LADIN AND IRAQ, NEW YORK POST, FEB 1
III. OSAMA BIN LADIN AND IRAQ [1], GUARDIAN, FEB 6
IV. OSAMA BIN LADIN AND IRAQ [2], GUARDIAN, FEB 6
The NYT, yesterday, reported that no traces of the VX precursor,
Empta, nor its degradation product, Empa, could be found in 13 samples
taken from the al-Shifa pharmaceutical plant and its grounds last Oct.
That work was supervised by the chairman of the Boston U. chemistry
department, hired by the law firm representing Salih Idris, owner of the
plant. Also, Idris' lawyers hired Kroll "to conduct a detailed review
of the Shifa controversy. In their report, made available to the New
York Times, Kroll Associates found no evidence of a direct link between
Idris and bin Ladin," even as the White House maintained, "We stand by
our evidence linking this plant to bin Ladin's network."
Vincent Cannistraro, former Chief of Counterterrorism Operations for
the CIA's Counterterrorism Center, has suggested a very sensible and
quite clever explanation for what was going on at al-Shifa--why it
turned out to be a pharmaceutical factory; why the US had compelling
evidence linking it to VX; and why it can't be found now.
When US officials were obliged to defend their decision to attack the
al-Shifa plant, after the Aug 20 strike, they revealed an Iraqi link to
al-Shifa, as reported, for example, in the NYT Aug 25. US officials
also revealed the existence of other sites in Khartoum thought to be
associated with Iraq and VX production. Clinton chose al-Shifa as a
target, because it was the only VX-related site not near a populated
area.
Although the CIA did not know al-Shifa made pharmaceuticals, the
State Dept did, because al Shifa was authorized by the UN sanctions
committee to ship medicines to Iraq. Cannistraro suggested that Empta,
manufactured at another Khartoum site, was stored, even perhaps
packaged, at al-Shifa, to be sent to Baghdad, under UNSCR 986, looking
to all the world like a pharmaceutical product.
That would explain how Empta could be found in a soil sample outside
the facility-a leak/spill?; but also why extensive tests in the facility
subsequently, including of the septic tank, did not detect it. It would
also explain why Iraqi CW personnel had contact with a pharmaceutical
plant. Moreover, Iraqi intelligence would think of something like that.
Indeed, Scott Ritter, in his Sept 3 Senate testimony [see "Iraq News,"
Sept 7], explained that Iraq was importing proscribed and dual use
material under cover of UNSCR 986.
Finally, given the proximity of Iraq's angry suspension of UNSCOM
inspections, Aug 5, and the simultaneous terrorist assaults on the two
US embassies, Aug 7, it would seem that in the Aug 20 strikes, the US,
hit two targets--Osama bin Ladin, in Afghanistan, and Iraq, in Sudan,
even as the White House has tried to blur that, with the claim that bin
Ladin was linked to the al-Shifa plant. The White House did something
similar in June, 1993, in that, when it struck Iraqi intelligence
headquarters then, it did not clearly and fully explain the several
reasons for the attack [see "Iraq News," Jan 27].
On the Jim Lehrer News Hour, Jan 21, 1998, over a year ago, as the
second Iraq crisis began, Clinton, warning of the danger Iraq posed,
said, "Think how many can be killed by just a tiny bit of anthrax, and
think about how it's not just that Saddam Hussein might put it on a Scud
missile, an anthrax head, and send it on to some city he wants to
destroy. Think about all the other terrorists and other bad actors who
could just parade through Baghdad and pick up their stores. . . . This
is a serious thing with me, this is a very serious thing. You imagine
the capacity of these tiny amounts of biological agents to cause great
harm; it's something we need to get after."
Clinton understands the danger, but apparently does not want to
address it in the only way that it can be properly addressed--by getting
rid of Saddam. Clinton also said on that program, justifying the
seemingly tough line he was taking then, "What's the issue? Weapons of
mass destruction. What's the answer? The U.N inspectors." And he also
said that he did not have sex with that woman. It is all of a piece.
"Iraq News" has learned what precipitated the earlier rash of
articles about Bin Ladin and Iraq [see "Iraq News," Jan 27].
A senior Iraqi intelligence official, Farouk Hijazi, newly appointed
as Iraq's ambassador to Turkey, did visit Osama bin Ladin in Afghanistan
in December, as several of those articles reported.
There has been more reporting on bin Ladin and Iraq. All of it
included the suggestion that Iraq is coordinating with bin Ladin on CBW
terrorism.
The Italian paper, Corriere della Sera, reported Feb 1, "Terrorist
cells belonging to the network organized by Osama bin Laden . . . are
ready to go into action in the countries of the Persian Gulf and Europe.
According to a confidential report, the list of targets is ready. It
was agreed in Kandahar (Afghanistan) 21 December by Osama himself and
Farouk Hijazi. . . The new recruits, together with the veterans of the
wars in Afghanistan and Bosnia, form the secret army that is expected to
use its weapons against all those who oppose the rais of Baghdad. In
order to make them even more dangerous, traditional training has been
supplemented with training in the use of chemical weapons, toxins, and
viruses . . ."
The New York Post, Feb 1, reported, "Saddam Hussein-battered,
humiliated and increasingly isolated-plans to resort to terrorism in
revenge for US airstrikes against his country. . . US officials say the
CIA has received 'credible and reliable' intelligence reports that
Saddam is forging alliances with some of the Middle East's most
bloodthirsty terrorists-including Osama Bin Ladin and Abu Nidal-as part
of an apparently new campaign to strike American targets and possibly
destablise Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. . . . US officials are concerned
about the possibility that Saddam could not only help with funding and
logistics for Bin Ladin's far-flung network, . . . but he could also
help the group acquire chemical and biological weapons."
The Guardian, Feb 6, carried two articles. The shorter article
began, "Saddam Hussein's regime has opened talks with Osama bin Laden,
bringing closer the threat of a terrorist attack using chemical,
biological or nuclear weapons." But as Ahmed Allawi, a senior INC
official, advised, that it is not new, "There is a long history of
contacts between the Mukhabarat [Iraqi secret service] and Osama bin
Ladin."
Also, Cannistraro explained that the Hijazi-bin Ladin meeting occurred
"with the knowledge of the Taliban leader, Mullah Omar." As a reader
remarked, the Taliban are a nasty bunch and the US does not recognize
them as the legitimate Gov't of Afghanistan. Rather, it recognizes the
Afghan Gov't in exile, in Tehran.
The longer Guardian article, entitled, "The Western nightmare: Saddam
and Bin Ladin versus the World," reporting on the Hijzazi-Bin Ladin
meeting, observed, "Thus, the world's most notorious pariah state, armed
with its half-built hoard of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons,
tried to embrace the planet's most prolific terrorist. . . .
"But it is not just the US which finds itself in the putative firing
line. Since RAF bombers took part in air strikes in Iraq in November
[sic], British citizens have also become primary targets. Talking to
the London-based Arabic newspaper, Asharq al-Awsat, a month after the
air strikes on Iraq, Mr. Bin Ladin explicitly added British civilians to
his 'divinely-ordained' list of targets. 'The British and American
people have widely voiced their support for their leaders' decision to
attack Iraq, which makes all those people, in addition to the Jews who
occupy Palestine into people warring [against God],' he said. . . .
Still, as one British-based expert cautioned, "It's dangerous to
characterize [bin Ladin] as the be all and end all of this problem . . .
Political Islam is on the rise and terrorist groups will continue to
organise in spite of all the security measures. And bin Ladin has
faithful lieutenants so even if he's assassinated the phenomenon isn't
going to go away."
Indeed, that would be particularly true, if, as "Iraq News" believes,
the very worst of the terrorism of the Militant Muslim Fundamentalists,
including bin Ladin, is carried out with the technical assistance and
support of terrorist states, and Iraq in particular, as Saddam has some
very major complaints and very big scores to settle.
|
NEWSLETTER
|
| Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|
|
