UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Space

10 February 2003

Scientists Seek to Learn How Much Research Data Lost with Columbia

(Shuttle carried science experiments from around the world) (1110)
By James Fuller
Washington File Science Writer
Washington -- The space shuttle Columbia - its 16-day mission devoted
entirely to science - carried more than 80 experiments sponsored by
space agencies, universities and organizations from around the world.
Researchers are now working to determine exactly how much research
data was lost on February 1 when Columbia broke up high above the
Earth as it descended for a landing at Kennedy Space Center in
Florida. Fortunately, some of the scientific data collected by
Columbia's seven-astronaut crew was downlinked to researchers on Earth
during the mission.
The experiments aboard Columbia - most contained within a new SPACEHAB
pressurized research laboratory carried in the shuttle's cargo bay -
included a study on fire suppression from the Colorado School of
Mines, studies on combustion engines from the University of Southern
California, research on bone growth in microgravity by a team of
Canadian institutions, and a study of the impact of dust clouds on
global warming from Tel Aviv University - the experiment overseen on
the shuttle by Ilan Ramon, Israel's first astronaut.
There were also biological investigations sponsored by the European
Space Agency that examined the cardiopulmonary changes occurring in
astronauts during space flight, and others examining bone formation,
immune system functioning, and connective tissue growth and repair.
The German Space Agency sponsored experiments that measured the
development of the gravity-sensing organs of fish in the absence of
gravity's effects, while the U.S. Air Force conducted a communications
experiment. There were even experiments organized by elementary school
students in Australia, China, Israel, Japan, Liechtenstein and the
United States probing the effects of space flight on fish, spiders,
ants, silkworms, bees and inorganic crystals.
Microgravity has become a powerful tool for studying the inner
workings of flames, the behavior of human cells and other phenomena.
On Earth these studies run into limitations imposed by the effects of
gravity. The term microgravity refers to the fact that those on a
spacecraft orbiting the planet experience from one-thousandth to
one-millionth of Earth's normal gravitational pull as they freefall
around the globe.
"There are many aspects of space we can't mimic on Earth," said John
Charles, a shuttle mission scientist at the Johnson Space Center in
Houston. "We can turn down air pressure in laboratory vacuum chambers
and bombard samples with space-like radiation. We can't turn off
gravity, though, or look down on Earth from above. Space is a truly
alien environment. Many things behave differently up there."
A good example was the flame experiments conducted aboard Columbia.
Unlike flames on Earth, which have a tear drop shape caused by air
rising in a gravitational field, flames in space break apart into
floating spheres a few millimeters in diameter. Each of these flame
balls, created in a chamber about the size of an office trash can
filled with combustible gases, produces one to two watts of thermal
power - much less than a 50-watt birthday candle. They burn using
almost no fuel, something researchers would like to replicate in
gas-saving auto engines. According to data sent back to Earth from
Columbia, the shuttle astronauts created and observed the weakest
flames ever created - which were as small as 2 millimeters across.
The astronauts aboard Columbia also tested a new commercial
fire-fighting system that puts out blazes with a fine water mist -
instead of using harmful chemicals or large quantities of water that
damage property. The shuttle tests used a humidifier-like device to
produce water drops about 20 microns in size - about 50 times smaller
than the drops produced by conventional sprinklers. Also, in
microgravity, air currents are reduced or eliminated, making it easier
for scientists to observe exactly how water interacts with a flame to
put it out.
Until recently, bromine-based compounds called halons were used to
attack fires chemically - especially in places like computer and
document storage rooms. In 1998, the production of these chemicals was
banned worldwide because they damage the Earth's protective ozone
layer. "We are working to find an acceptable replacement for halons,
and water mist appears to be the best choice," said Thomas McKinnon,
lead scientist for the water mist research project at the Colorado
School of Mines in Golden.
Another experiment aboard Columbia compressed granular materials to
get a better understanding of construction techniques that may provide
stronger foundations for structures in areas where earthquakes, floods
and landslides are common. When an earthquake strikes, wet soil
underground sometimes "liquefies." This happened during the 1989 Loma
Prieta earthquake in San Francisco, when vibrations liquefied the
water-soaked soil in the Marina District of the city, causing
buildings to sink until their third floors were at ground level. This
transition to liquefaction is rapid and poorly understood.
Stein Sture, a professor of engineering at the University of Colorado
in Boulder, says studying the liquefaction process with sand in
ground-based laboratories is difficult because the sand's own weight
creates stress on the grains. However, he says experimenters in space
could remove that stress and more easily probe soil liquefaction.
"Understanding this soil liquefaction process will help engineers
decide when a site is safe for construction, and perhaps lead to
designs for building foundations that help prevent liquefaction from
occurring," Sture said.
Columbia also carried many experiments involving biology and
biotechnology. Several studies, for example, grew protein crystals
more purely and with fewer flaws than is possible on Earth. One such
protein crystal-growing experiment was studying possible therapies
against factors that cause cancers to spread, and another was aimed at
the development of a new technique for encapsulating anti-cancer drugs
to improve their efficiency.
A rotating bioreactor aboard Columbia suspended and nurtured cells for
three-dimensional tissue growth under conditions impossible to
replicate on Earth. One such experiment on prostate cancer documented
greater-than-expected growth of tumor cells in space. Other studies
aboard Columbia were aimed at finding out how viruses spread and are
shared within closed environments.
Some scientists have long maintained that the caliber of the science
being performed aboard the shuttle and the space station did not
justify the costs of manned spaceflights. Now, with the world still
grieving over the deaths of the seven Columbia astronauts, some expect
that argument to intensify. However, officials of the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) argue that if even one
space-based experiment eventually results in a new therapy, or cleaner
engines, or some other benefit, then the investment in space research
will be recouped many times over.
(The Washington File is a product of the Office of International
Information Programs, U.S. Department of State. Web site:
http://usinfo.state.gov)



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list