INTERCEPTOR FROM PROTOTYPE SYSTEM MISSES TARGET OVER PACIFIC, PENTAGON SAYS
By John Diamond
Washington Bureau
January 19, 2000
WASHINGTON --
A live test of a prototype national missile defense system ended in failure
Tuesday night as a missile interceptor missed its dummy warhead target high
over the Pacific Ocean.
The failure represents a setback for a multibillion-dollar weapons system
that President Clinton was poised to approve as early as July.
The tests conducted by the Pentagon involved launching a Minuteman II
missile with a dummy warhead and a balloon decoy into space from Vandenberg
Air Force Base, Calif., at 8:19 CST. Twenty minutes later, some 4,300 miles
away, on Meck islet in the Kwajalein atoll in the southwestern Pacific, an
"exo-atmospheric kill vehicle" was launched in a two-stage rocket.
Built by Raytheon Co., the kill vehicle, nicknamed a "smart rock," weighed
120 pounds and carried optical sensors, fuel tanks and thrusters. It was
designed to discern between the balloon decoy--which, in the vacuum of space,
zipped along at the same speed as a warhead--and the dummy warhead.
"Government and industry officials will conduct an extensive review . . .
to determine the reason or reasons" for the failure, said spokesman Marc
Raimondi of the Pentagon's Ballistic Missile Defense Organization. The review
would take several weeks, he said.
In the first live-fire test in October, the kill vehicle closed on its
target and, by the force of a collision at a combined speed of 15,000 m.p.h.,
reduced it to dust.
Last week, a senior defense official briefing reporters on the missile
defense program conceded that in the October test, the kill vehicle initially
locked onto the balloon decoy and couldn't find the intended target. Only
because the two were close together did the kill vehicle steer toward and hit
the dummy warhead.
Tuesday's test plan had the same basic profile with an added degree of
difficulty. In October, the kill vehicle's computer knew ahead of time where
to fly to come within range of the missile. This time, the Pentagon was trying
to see whether its network of radars and communication links could guide the
smart rock to its target.
"It's hard to hit a bullet with a bullet at closing speeds of 15,000
m.p.h., and a lot of elements have to come into play for it to work," said
Pentagon spokesman Kenneth Bacon before the test.
The financial and security risks of building such a missile defense--to say
nothing of the technical challenges underscored by Tuesday night's
failure--are huge. The program would cost at least $13 billion. Russia could
make good on a threat to abandon its arms control commitments. China could
accelerate its missile-building effort.
Tuesday's test was particularly important because the Clinton
administration is requiring two hits, one involving a fully integrated system,
before he gives the system a go-ahead.
If another test scheduled for April or May ends in a success, Clinton could
be ready as early as July to declare that the national missile defense system
is ready for development and deployment by 2005. The White House already is
adding $2.2 billion to the budget for national missile defense, bringing the
sum the Pentagon plans to spend over the next five years to nearly $13 billion
by the time the system is ready for action. The General Accounting Office
estimates the first 100 interceptors could cost as much as $28 billion.
There are political risks to a decision against deployment. All the leading
Republican presidential candidates want to build and deploy a system that
could protect all 50 states against a limited missile attack. The political
pressure is on President Clinton to protect Vice President Al Gore's political
flank by approving development of the defense system, a smaller-scale heir to
President Ronald Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative, popularly known as
Star Wars.
"This has got everything to do with defending Al Gore against the
Republicans and not much to do with defending the United States against
missiles," said John Pike of the Federation of American Scientists, a watchdog
group that follows national security issues. "A simple political commitment by
this president to deploy a national missile defense simply inoculates Al Gore
in the fall campaign."
The missile defense system is not designed to protect the U.S. against a
massive Russian attack involving thousands of incoming warheads. The point is
to ward off a limited strike by a "rogue" state such as North Korea or Iran.
Even the most modest missile defense system would require the U.S. to
negotiate with Russia for changes in the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty.
The accord places strict limits on the scope of missile defenses the two
superpowers could deploy, based on the idea that missile defenses could lead
the country that has them to launch a nuclear first-strike without fear of
major retaliation.
Dimitri Yakushin, a senior aid to acting Russian President Vladimir Putin,
was in Washington meeting Tuesday with U.S. officials on a variety of issues,
including the ABM Treaty.
"We want to stick to the ABM Treaty. Our position has not changed,"
Yakushin said. "Any kind of move can destabilize the situation."
Daniel Goure of the Center for Strategic and International Studies said the
system envisioned by the administration poses no threat to Russia because it
could not defend against an attack of the scale Russia could mount.
Copyright and terms of service
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list