Subject: Disappearing/missing spysats in the news From: thomsona@netcom.com (Allen Thomson) Date: 1996/11/08 Message-Id: <thomsonaE0J1C2.J13@netcom.com> Newsgroups: sci.space.policy,alt.politics.org.cia The threads on SSP and APOC concerning missing and/or high- flying spysats seem to have engendered some activity in the mainstream media: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Stargazers ponder ``missing'' U.S. spy satellites REUTER LONDON 6 NOV 1996 [EXCERPTS] Four U.S. spy satellites ``missing'' since 1990 may have been moved into secret orbits so they could carry on their covert duties without being tracked, the New Scientist magazine [*] reported... Ted Molczan, a satellite spotter in Toronto monitored three of the satellites from the time of their launch from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California in 1990 and noticed they all disappeared after several weeks in their initial orbits.... John Pike, a space analyst with the Washington-based Federation of American Scientists noted that one of the satellites disappeared just before the Gulf War. If the satellite had died, the failure would have produced howls of protest from members of Congress who monitor U.S. intelligence gathering - something that did not happen, he said. A more intriguing possibility is that the satellites were placed into orbits which would move more slowly across the skies than other [spysats], giving them more time to photograph targets. Supporters of this theory point to the timing of the U.S. air strikes in Iraq in September. Military strikes are usually mounted immediately before a spy satellite passes overhead... But after the latest strikes..., no known spy satellites would have passed over the target area for between two and six hours. This suggests that one or more of the missing satellites may have been watching, satellite watchers said. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Interesting how news gets around in the Wired World, no? * A reliable if idiosyncratic informant has, ah, informed me that the New Scientist article may be found at http://www.newscientist.com/ps/thisweek/news/n0288.html
NEWSLETTER
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|