The Largest Security-Cleared Career Network for Defense and Intelligence Jobs - JOIN NOW

Homeland Security

VOICE OF AMERICA
SLUG: 5-55575 U.S. Detainees
DATE:
NOTE NUMBER:

DATE=7/8/04

TYPE=BACKGROUND REPORT

TITLE=U.S DETAINEES

NUMBER=5-55575

BYLINE=GARY THOMAS

DATELINE=WASHINGTON

CONTENT=

VOICED AT:

HEADLINE: Experts Say Detainee Tribunals in Uncharted Legal Territory

INTRO: The U.S. Defense Department is setting up a new legal procedure to allow detainees held in military custody to challenge their detention. The new procedure is a result of a Supreme Court ruling last week allowing the detainees access to a neutral body to review their status. As correspondent Gary Thomas reports from Washington, legal experts say the U-S government is establishing the new process in an effort to head off an expected wave of legal petitions from the detainees.

TEXT: Legal analysts say the new procedure is designed to stem a potential wave of new federal court cases filed on behalf of those detained in the U.S.-led anti-terrorism effort.

The Pentagon announced late Wednesday the creation of a new legal arena, dubbed the "Combatant Status Review Tribunal," in which the nearly 600 men held at the U.S. military base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba can challenge their status as "enemy combatants" before a three-member panel of U.S. military officers. They will be assigned a military officer as a "personal representative," but will not be allowed to have a lawyer.

But Rachel Meeropol of the Center for Constitutional Rights says the tribunal is unfairly weighted in favor of the government, because it does not give detainees the same legal rights, especially the right to a lawyer, that they would enjoy in a civilian U.S. court.

/// MEEROPOL ACT ///

"The government has said over and over again that they have already determined that these individuals are enemy combatants. And yet that is exactly the question that the Supreme Court said these detainees have the right to challenge. How can we possibly have a neutral tribunal determining a fact that they already assume?"

/// END ACT ///

/// OPT /// Eugene Fidell, a lawyer and president of the National Institute of Military Justice, says the review tribunal is uncharted legal territory.

/// FIDELL ACT ///

"This is yet another incident in the long and weird process that began after 9-11, where new kinds of legal measures are being taken or, in some cases, old legal measures are being dusted off and recycled in new circumstances. The law books don't help an enormous amount here. I think everybody is in a scramble. That includes the lawyers for the detainees, that includes the government's lawyers, and that also includes the federal judges."

/// END ACT /// /// END OPT ///

But the Bush administration says the process grants the detainees most of the legal rights of American citizens.

David Rivkin, who was a Justice Department legal counsel in the administrations of President Reagan and the first President Bush, says the rights afforded detainees before the new tribunal are unprecedented for foreign captives.

/// RIVKIN ACT ///

"The degree of due process the detainees are getting here - opportunity to call witnesses, or at least to have written statements submitted by witnesses, opportunity to have a personal representative - is a great deal more than has ever been provided."

/// END ACT ///

The detainees still have the right to be heard in U.S. courts, but legal analysts say the record of a tribunal case could have a great impact on a court decision. (signed)

NEB/GPT/MEM/FC



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list