With mainstream media repeatedly labeling Howard
Dean a fervent foe of the Iraq War, many antiwar-oriented Democrats
have flocked to Dean's campaign. But as the record shows, the presidential
candidate who opposed the war consistently and unwaveringly from the
beginning is Dennis Kucinich.
By contrast, Dean made alternately hawkish and
dovish statements on Iraq prior to the Oct 2002 Congressional resolution,
then muted his voice after the war started in March 2003, and recently
insisted to the Washington Post that "I don't even consider
myself a dove" and "now that we're there [in Iraq], we're
stuck." Dean has also declared the bloated Bush military budget
off-limits to cuts.
Here is a relevant timeline from mass media accounts:
Sept 21, 2002, KUCINICH -- "Leader of the
Opposition"
The NY Times runs a news story about how "a small group of
Democratic die-hards in the House is trying to rally opposition
to [Iraq] military action." The piece refers to "two dozen
or so mainly liberal lawmakers...though they may be viewed as outside
the mainstream of even their own party, they are raising their voices
against an invasion, even if their leadership is not." The
piece accurately calls Rep. Kucinich a "leader of the opposition"
and ends by quoting him: "This is an attempt to start a serious
debate inside the party."
Sept. 23, 2002, DEAN -- Might Endorse Pre-Emptive
Strike
Dean gives a waffling endorsement of President Bush's pre-emptive
war:
"Pre-emption is not off the table, but the moral high ground
does matter," he says, as quoted in the Iowa City Press-Citizen.
The paper reports that Dean "also said he would endorse a pre-emptive
strike against Iraq if it can be proven that Saddam Hussein has
access to weapons of mass destruction and the means to discharge
them."
Sept. 25, 2002, KUCINICH -- Denounces Pre-Emption
Introduced by anchor Judy Woodfruff on CNN as "one of the most
active House opponents to President Bush's proposed resolution on
Iraq," Kucinich denounces Bush's policy of pre-emptive war:
"Since when do we equate patriotism with going to war? Since
when do we equate patriotism with preemptive strikes and with unilateralism?...America's
always been a nation that's worked with other nations. And after
September 11 of last year, we had the entire world community working
with us. Now we're separating ourselves, isolating ourselves from
the world community because we want to go it alone."
Sept. 29, 2002, DEAN -- "If You Don't Do
This...We Will Go Into Iraq"
On CBS "Face the Nation": After saying that the administration
"had not yet made" its case that Saddam was an immediate
threat, and that if we attack Iraq, "it's got to be gone about
in a very different way," Dean also states: "It's very
simple. Here's what we ought to have done. We should have gone to
the UN Security Council. We should have asked for a resolution to
allow the inspectors back in with no pre-conditions. And then we
should have given them a deadline, saying, 'If you don't do this,
say, within 60 days, we will reserve our right as Americans to defend
ourselves and we will go into Iraq.'"
Sept. 29, 2002, KUCINICH: "There Is No Imminent
Threat"
On the same CBS "Face the Nation": "At this point,
frankly, the evidence does not suggest that Iraq was connected to
9/11, that there's any connection between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda,
that there's any connection between Iraq and the anthrax attacks
on this country. We don't hear from the CIA that Iraq has any usable
weapons of mass destruction that they could deliver to the United
States." Kucinich adds: "There's no imminent threat. If
I thought there was an imminent threat to this country, I wouldn't
hesitate to vote for action. But I have to tell you, there is no
imminent threat."
Oct. 10, 2002, WAR RESOLUTION -- Dean at 1%
Thanks heavily to Kucinich's leadership, nearly 2/3 of House Democrats
vote "No" on the war resolution. But the four men in Congress
then running for president all vote "Yes": Kerry, Gephardt,
Edwards and Lieberman. Dean is at 1 percent in polls (Marist College
poll, Oct. 9-10).
February 2003, DEAN -- "Democratic Wing of
Democratic Party"
First reference in news media (according to Nexis Database) of Dean
using the Paul Wellstone-line: "I'm here to represent the Democratic
wing of the Democratic Party."
February 19, 2003 DEAN -- Unilateral Action Is...Unavoidable
Choice
Salon's Jake Tapper summarizes Dean's oft-repeated position on attacking
Iraq: "Saddam must be disarmed, but with a multilateral force
under the auspices of the United Nations. If the U.N. in the end
chooses not to enforce its own resolutions, then the U.S. should
give Saddam 30 to 60 days to disarm, and if he doesn't, unilateral
action is a regrettable, but unavoidable, choice."
March 19, 2003, WAR BEGINS
March 20, 2003: DEAN (Muted Remarks) vs. KUCINICH
(Pulled No Punches)
Dean and Kucinich address press groups in Washington D.C. AP reports
on their respective comments:
Dean: "'I'm not going to back off my criticism
of the president's policy, but I'm certainly going to change the
tone,' Dean said between the speeches. 'There won't be the kind
of red meat remarks that you make in front of partisan Democratic
audiences.'"
Kucinich: "Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio took
his presidential campaign to the same newspaper audiences, but he
pulled no punches in assailing the president for starting the war.
He urged Bush to bring the troops home and focus on problems in
America's cities, including unemployment, pollution and failing
schools. 'This is a sad day for America, the world community and
the people of Iraq,' he said. 'These are offensive, not defensive
attacks, and they are in violation of international law.'"
May 2, 2003, BUSH DECLARES END OF "MAJOR
COMBAT" IN IRAQ
August 12, 2003, DEAN -- "We Cannot Leave
Iraq"
"I think it was a mistake to go into Iraq in the long run.
Now that we're there, we're stuck there, and the administration
has no plan for how to deal with it, and we cannot leave because
losing the peace is not an option. We cannot leave Iraq" (Buchanan
& Press, MSNBC)
September 7, 2003, KUCINICH -- Get U.S. Out and
U.N. In
"The Bush Administration's arrogant occupation of Iraq has
harmed the United States' position in the world community, caused
the deaths of 289 American soldiers at last count, and diverted
tens of billions of dollars from domestic needs. Now the President
is asking for another $87 billion. We must allow the UN to take
over peacekeeping operations in the country. The UN must take over
management, accounting, and distribution to the Iraqi people of
Iraq's oil profits. There must be no privatization of the Iraqi
oil industry. The UN must handle the awarding of all contracts for
the rebuilding of Iraq so that there can be no more sweetheart contracts
for companies like Halliburton."