Military


Vertical and Short Takeoff and Landing Aircraft V/STOL



  • AV-8 Harrier

  • F-35B JSF STVOL

  • USAF / Army
  • XV-1 XH-35
  • XV-2 S-57
  • XV-3 XH-33

    1962 Joint
  • OV-1 Mohawk
  • CV-2 C-7 Caribou
  • XV-3 XH-33
  • XV-4 Hummingbird
  • XV-5 Vertifan
  • XV-6 P-1127 Kestrel
  • CV-7 C-8 Buffalo
  • XV-8 Rogallo
  • XV-9
  • OV-10 Bronco
  • XV-11 MARVEL
  • XFV-12
  • OV-12 Pilatus PC-6
  • XV-13
  • XV-14 Bell 301
  • XV-15
  • AV-16 Harrier +
  • XV-17 [? Army 1973]
  • UV-18 Twin Otter
  • V-19 [? USN 1977]
  • UV-20A Pilatus PC-6
  • PV-21 PACES airship
  • V-22 Osprey
  • UV-23 Scout
  • XV-24 JCA



  • XFY-1
  • XFV-1

  • X-13
  • X-14
  • X-18
  • X-19
  • X-22
  • X-32B JSF - Boeing
  • X-35B JSF - LockMart
  • VZ-1 / HO-1 Pawnee
  • VZ-2
  • VZ-3
  • VZ-4
  • VZ-5
  • VZ-6
  • VZ-7 Aerial Jeep
  • VZ-8 Flying Jeep
  • VZ-9 Avro Car
  • VZ-10 (XV-4A) Hummingbird
  • VZ-11 (XV-5A) Vertifan
  • VZ-12 (XV-6A) Kestrel


  • Convair Model 48 "Charger"
  • U.S. V/STOL Research Aircraft, 19541971

    Design Mftr. TypeDescriptionFirst
    Flight
    Supporting
    Organization
    XFY-1ConvairVTOL Propeller tail sitter1954Navy
    XFV-1LockheedVTOL Propeller tail sitter1954Navy
    XV-3Bell Heli.V/STOL Tilt-rotor1955Air Force (Ames)
    X-13RyanV/STOL Jet lift1957Air Force
    VZ-2VertolV/STOL Tilt-wing1958Army (Langley)
    VZ-3RyanV/STOL Deflected slipstream1958Army (Ames)
    VZ-4DoakV/STOL Tilt-duct1958Army (Langley)
    X-14Bell AeroV/STOL Jet lift1958Air Force (Ames)
    VZ-9AvroV/STOL Peripheral jet lift1959Army, Air Force
    C-134StroukoffSTOL Boundary layer control flap1959Air Force (Ames)
    X-18HillerV/STOL Tilt-wing1960 Air Force
    X-100Curtiss-WrightV/STOL Tilt-propeller1960Air Force
    XV-1McDonnellV/STOL Compound helicopter1960 Army
    C-130BLockheedSTOL Boundary layer control flap1962Air Force (Ames)
    XV-4ALockheedV/STOL Augmented jet lift1962Army
    XV-5AGE-RyanV/STOL Fan-in-wing1964Army
    XV-9AHughesV/STOL Hot cycle rotor1964Army
    XC-142LTVV/STOL Tilt-wing1964Air Force (Langley)
    X-19Curtiss-WrightV/STOL Tilt-propeller1965Air Force
    X-22Bell AeroV/STOL Tilt-duct1967Navy, Air Force, NASA
    XV-5BGE-RyanV/STOL Fan-in-wing1968Ames
    XV-4BLockheedV/STOL Jet lift1969Air Force

    To date, there have only been a few operational jet VTOL designs, the British Harrier and the Russian YAK-36, both of which are subsonic aircraft. While at least one supersonic VTOL design has flown, the Mach 2 Mirage III-V back in 1966, there has yet to be an operational supersonic VTOL aircraft.

    This is largely due to the need for increased internal volume for the vertical lift apparatus and fuel capacity. Also, most concepts for vertical lift tend to increase the aircraft's cross-sectional area near the aircraft's center of gravity, increasing the supersonic wave drag. Finally, the state of the art in engine thrust-to-weight ratio has imposed an excessive weight penalty on VTOL designs. It has simply been impossible, up to now, to provide an operational aircraft having both vertical and supersonic forward flight with any practical range.

    Modern supersonic jet fighters have a thrust-to-weight ratio exceeding one, so it would seem fairly easy to point the jet exhaust downward and, therefore, attain vertical flight at "no cost". Unfortunately, this is complicated by the balance problem. Many subsonic jets and virtually all supersonic jets are designed with the engine at the rear, the cockpit and avionics at the nose and the payload and fuel near the center of the aircraft. This traditional layout places the expendables at the center of gravity, co-locates the parts of the aircraft requiring cooling (crew and avionics), and keeps the avionics away from the hot and vibrating engine.

    If the thrust exceeds the weight, vertical flight could be obtained simply by deflecting the thrust downwards. However, some vertical upward force is required forward of the aircraft's center of gravity. In order to balance the vertical thrust force at the tail. This balance problem is possibly the single most important problem encountered in the design of a VTOL jet fighter.

    There are two conceptual approaches to solving the balance problem. Either the thrust location must be moved to the center of gravity, or an additional thrust force has to be applied near the nose. Both of these approaches will tend to move the design of the aircraft away from the optimal layout. Generally, jet VTOL concepts can be divided into those which utilize fairly conventional engines and those which use modified engines so that the fan and core air are split, with the fan air ducted and exhausted from some location separate from the core air.

    The conventional engine VTOL concepts which do not use additional lift engines for vertical flight must have a net takeoff thrust-to-weight ratio in excess of one. If the jet exhaust is not diverted to some other location for vertical flight, the aircraft must either be a tail sitter (VATOL), or it must have the engine exhaust located at the aircraft center of gravity and capable of vectoring downward for vertical flight. This can be accomplished by using a vectoring nozzle or nacelles which tilt.

    The X-14 research aircraft had vectoring nozzles at the center of gravity, with the engines out in front. This is probably not a good arrangement for most applications because the cockpit winds up in the rear for balance, which does not provide acceptable visibility for the pilot. Also, in forward flight, the jet exhaust scrubs alongside the fuselage which causes thermal and acoustic problems. Tilt nacelles are heavy, but may be the best compromise for some applications. Grumman Aircraft Corporation has been pursuing a tilt-nacelle concept for Naval applications for a number of years.

    Some VTOL concepts provide a means of diverting the exhaust flow to provide vertical lift. This is generally done by a retracting blocker device in the engine which shuts off the flow through the rearward-facing nozzle. The flow is then diverted forward through internal ducting. All of these VSTOL approaches, however, exact significant penalties in weight, cost, and completely when compared to a conventional jet aircraft design.

    In the area of propeller-powered aircraft, the tilt-rotor concept, as tested in the Bell XV-15, seems to offer the best compromise between helicopter-like vertical flight and efficient wing-borne cruise. The tilt-rotor concept is the basis of the V-22 Osprey.



    NEWSLETTER
    Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list