Intelligence

National Policy

  • Fourth Amendment -- Search and Seizure "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated; and no Warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." ["Constitution of the United States, Analysis and Interpretation: 2002 Edition" U.S. Government Printing Office.]

National Strategy

  • The National Intelligence Strategy of the United States of America Office of the Director of National Intelligence Released 26 Oct 2005 -- "The New concept of 'national intelligence' codified by the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Act passed by Congress in 2004 has its origins in the tragedy of September 11, 2001 and President Bush's National Security Strategy of the United States of America." [PDF 696 KB]

  • National Counterintelligence Strategy of the United States Office of the National Counterintelligence Executive Mar 2005 -- "The Counterintelligence Enhancement Act of 2002 (50 USC 401) directs that the Office of the National Counterintelligence Executive produce, on an annual basis, a strategy for the counterintelligence programs and activities of the United States Government. This is the first national counterintelligence strategy promulgated pursuant to that Act." [PDF]

Executive Orders

U.S. Department of Justice - Office of Legal Counsel Opinions

  • MEMORANDUM FOR THE FILES - Re: Status of Certain OLC Opinions Issued in the Aftermath of the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001 15 Jan 2009 -- The purpose of this memorandum is to confirm that certain propositions stated in several opinions issued by the Office of Legal Counsel in 2001-2003 respecting the allocation of authorities between the President and Congress in matters of war and national security do not reflect the current views of this Office. We have previously withdrawn or superseded a number of opinions that depended upon one or more of these propositions. For reasons discussed herein, today we explain why these propositions are not consistent with the current views of OLC, and we advise that caution should be exercised before relying in other respects on the remaining opinions identified below [PDF Version]

The Opinions below are no longer United States Policy

U.S. Dept. of Justice

Other

Court Rulings

US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

US District Court for the Southern District of New York

United States Court of Appeals for the Six Circuit


 



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list